I'M BEING BLACKMAILED D:
- Thread starter DesLife
- Start date
Pusianka
New member
- Tings
- 50
What I meant is how I made a laugh stock of myself, because all I did was take up a topic tht turned out to be controversial to mister big admin and still it hadn't been unlocked even though tere was new answer added and I can't even answer it there. I really do believe the admins are not dumb, but illogical.
Spanex
New member
- Tings
- 0
You actually did kind of made laughing stock of yourself by overreacting about people's signatures in the first post of your locked topic. Sure they're big, but they're not annoyingly huge, and on top of that, your example in your first post was over exaggerated. Anyway, what you were implying was that the sigs were annoying to everybody, and that's obviously not the case. Especially after you began to insult people for disagreeing with you, they now seek to make fun of you because that's what many of the members (admins included) here in RPC do when somebody begins to act like a dumb idiot. 
I would suggest you deal with it, let it slide and don't do it again. But that's up to you, really.
I would suggest you deal with it, let it slide and don't do it again. But that's up to you, really.
Pusianka
New member
- Tings
- 50
I can't agree with any of that, but if this is the logic of all here then we have nothing to talk about! I didn't go on sb because he contradicted me or disagreed, I went on ppl for calling me names. Also I never said that everyone thinks its a problem, I said that IT IS A PROBLEM, just noone questions it because everyone is doing it(So they want to be popular...).
Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.
If it makes anyone happier, I didn't choose the sigs but just took all of those that were at the moment on front pages of the forum. Sure some of these are clearly ok in terms of their look but are too big! However I was no allowed to get into conversation because the thread was locked by particular person...
Yes I did made an angry face in first post but I didn't insulted anyone, I just concentrated on the topic of sigs which are too big, THEY ARE.
If it makes anyone happier, I didn't choose the sigs but just took all of those that were at the moment on front pages of the forum. Sure some of these are clearly ok in terms of their look but are too big! However I was no allowed to get into conversation because the thread was locked by particular person...
The Edditaur
New member
- Tings
- 5,635
...Which you can expect for calling the pictures that people spent lots of time and love into to make them as good looking as possible a pile of "FLYING CRAP".Pusianka said:
But the thing is you're acting like it's some great big problem, when in fact it isn't anything at all. In fact, RayFan even told you how to stop the signatures from showing themselves to you back a few pages so that you didn't need to worry about.Pusianka said:
No, as a matter of fact people make a signature because it pretties up the place. It also allows a way of identifying that user because people can see that picture and instantly know it's that user posting.Pusianka said:
...I'd like to direct you to the quote below from your original post.Pusianka said:
'Nuff said.Pusianka said:
As I said above, when you insult something which many people worked hard on to allow them to be identified instantly by the rest of the forum (Or post about an "important issue" which isn't really an issue nor is it important for that matter), you're bound to get your topic locked. Especially when you start it off with the bitch fit you had.Pusianka said:
The Edditaur
New member
- Tings
- 5,635
:boon: So much facepalmery to describe this. So much. Please explain how my post above is a "manipulation"?Pusianka said:
Adsolution
New member
- Tings
- 110,541
Yes, please do explain, Pusianka. I asked you if you wanted to take my hand and laugh this off, but what do I get in return? :sad: Such an ungrateful one.The Edditaur said:
The Edditaur
New member
- Tings
- 5,635
Right, let me correct you there.Pusianka said:
I even highlighted it in red for you. Not many people get that kind of privilege. You basically said in your earlier post that you "hadn't insulted anyone". That above quote, the one highlighted in red, is the one which proves otherwise. Do you understand now? Would you also care to point out where I went wrong in every other part of my dissection of your post? Because you only stated there why one part of it was wrong in your post.The Edditaur said:
Adsolution
New member
- Tings
- 110,541
Pussi, now you're merely coming up with lame excuses to cover your sorry immature ass. You know exactly where you went wrong, so you can either admit yourself or continue to make yourself look like an even larger, fatter fool. You're not clever, you're not witty, you can't for the life of you come up with a decent come back, so sit down and stare at your feet or something.Pusianka said:
The Edditaur
New member
- Tings
- 5,635
:boon:Pusianka said:
Right, I showed you the actual full two bits which directly contradicting each other. You can't possibly misinterpret it this time. Those two bits in red over there are the ones which are proving a darn thing. Oh, and also when you called all of our signatures "flying crap". That strengthens my point as well.
'Nuff is internet lingo, FYI. So no need to be concerned for me, I'm just trying to "be hip" and "with the kids".
The Edditaur
New member
- Tings
- 5,635
...Must I post this again?Pusianka said:
*Sigh*, okay then.
Adsolution
New member
- Tings
- 110,541
The fuck does that have to do with anything?Pusianka said: