Oh right haha I read that totally wrong hahhaZeptoRay wrote:Because its 20K more and that playing with the keyboard was a pain for me?
#retardationsettingin

Oh right haha I read that totally wrong hahhaZeptoRay wrote:Because its 20K more and that playing with the keyboard was a pain for me?
Wtf!?DTUCC wrote:i've thought about this for a while, and indeed i agree.MandM81 wrote:R3 is also a competition for the first spot in HoF. And if anyone wants to make a challenge for the first spot, I think that person should at least come up with ideas of his or her own to earn that spot.
Years later, mandm set the same trend when he chose not to reveal his lates findings in FC.
Long story short: I chose not to give any more concrete information about my level scores, as much as you'd like to see them. I believe it adds another layer of strategy to the compettion for the first spot, and that's what it's ultimately about: competition.

Respect man. This guy should totally be nicer then he's being. You've been super nice considering he's outranked you and you've stayed modest.MandM81 wrote:Wtf!?DTUCC wrote:i've thought about this for a while, and indeed i agree.MandM81 wrote:R3 is also a competition for the first spot in HoF. And if anyone wants to make a challenge for the first spot, I think that person should at least come up with ideas of his or her own to earn that spot.
Years later, mandm set the same trend when he chose not to reveal his lates findings in FC.
Long story short: I chose not to give any more concrete information about my level scores, as much as you'd like to see them. I believe it adds another layer of strategy to the compettion for the first spot, and that's what it's ultimately about: competition.![]()
Well, I didn’t really want to bother replying to this nonsense, but since you quote me I guess I have to put some things straight.
Regarding my so-called secrecy, the correct version is:
Levels CF through TOTL: I have documented every improvement in the walkthroughs.
FC: I have documented my score in that level with a screenshot, and I have made public where the points are found, namely the Matuvu-combo in part 2 and some minor improvements in part 4.
My secrecy is thus limited to finding out how to play the Matuvu-combo.
So if you want to meet my level of secrecy you need to post a screenshot of the level which you improved and also make public which part you improved.
For the future, please don’t quote me out of context in order to rationalize your decisions. And may I remind you; I made several videos on your demand when you were stuck at 835k points for years.
I’m not sure whether I should laugh or take it as a compliment that you are so scared of even telling the members of this forum which level you improved.
I didn't picture that any different, as you without a doubt have realized since you've quoted the exact passage:MandM81 wrote:Regarding my so-called secrecy, the correct version is:
Levels CF through TOTL: I have documented every improvement in the walkthroughs.
nothing to feel offended about here. if that did not come across this way though, i apologize.DTUCC wrote:Years later, mandm set the same trend when he chose not to reveal his lates findings in FC.
no offense, but i find it a bit rash of you to judge me based on what you've read during the past few days. this thread has a history of about 4800 posts, most of which contributed to my current point of view. i don't mind anyone who wants to add something to this conversation but i believe you should at least get yourself a rough outline of what this is about.rolesfamily wrote:Respect man. This guy should totally be nicer then he's being. You've been super nice considering he's outranked you and you've stayed modest.

DTUCC wrote:I don't intend to pick fights, but here are some thoughts i want to share:
I didn't picture that any different, as you without a doubt have realized since you've quoted the exact passage:MandM81 wrote:Regarding my so-called secrecy, the correct version is:
Levels CF through TOTL: I have documented every improvement in the walkthroughs.
nothing to feel offended about here. if that did not come across this way though, i apologize.DTUCC wrote:Years later, mandm set the same trend when he chose not to reveal his lates findings in FC.
in general, it appears you're feeling a lot more offended by my so called "nonsense" than you should be. what i did was objectively describe that the community has gone through a lot of shifts in its mentality from everything being released over held back combos to now complete discretion.
as i was expressing in my previous post, there's always someone who has to start - that's just the way it is, someone has to throw the first stone. it's everyone's free decision to do so (or not do so, for that matter).
when talking about "being scared" one should always ask oneself what other reason there could possibly be to hold back combos. i presume at no point in time you held back anything in fear of being overtaken by xenon, jona or whoever was right behind you at that point in time?
you said (if i may quote once again) that someone contending for first spot should at least come up with ideas of his or her own - and that's what i did, both in-game and competitively. i find your reaction somewhat inappropriate now that roles are reversed.
no offense, but i find it a bit rash of you to judge me based on what you've read during the past few days. this thread has a history of about 4800 posts, most of which contributed to my current point of view. i don't mind anyone who wants to add something to this conversation but i believe you should at least get yourself a rough outline of what this is about.rolesfamily wrote:Respect man. This guy should totally be nicer then he's being. You've been super nice considering he's outranked you and you've stayed modest.
But the roles have been reversed once before when I wasn't able to play for a long time. You briefly took over the top spot and I asked you, twice, what you did improve. You never replied to that request. And now history repeats itself.DTUCC wrote:I you said (if i may quote once again) that someone contending for first spot should at least come up with ideas of his or her own - and that's what i did, both in-game and competitively. i find your reaction somewhat inappropriate now that roles are reversed.

I was only responding to your original post because you dragged me into it by quoting me.DTUCC wrote:anyway, since you did not respond to a single point i made, i believe there is no use in continuing this conversation. this is becoming personal and i am not willing to have an argument on this basis.
i'll gladly look for another solution in the future though if we can have a conversation in a more reasonable tone. i'm looking forward to it


German.Haruka wrote:Which nationality are you, Cut? I need to add you to the HOF page in RayWiki.
I'm glad we finally do agree on something and I'll happily take that offer, but it's hard for me to leave some of your points uncommented:MandM81 wrote:Now move on please.
First off, I believe we both love this game as much as anyone else in this forum. I've been playing R3 from the day its been released, but never for the challenge to get an ultimate score or anything like that, but for the challenge to become #1 in the world ranking. Back in the days, that loss due to the missing vortex just hurt me a lot - I would still be willing to look into a HoF ranking that is judged by the percentage of every player's respective maximum score. I do admit that my demand for extra points was inappropriate, but bear with me here, I just feel really bitter about this missing vortex even to this day when I think about it. I never asked for extra points since, though, because I had realised that this is impossible to properly execute.MandM81 wrote:1. You demanded extra points in FC because of the way the Vortex appeared in one of the parts.
2. Mountain Goat released a way to cheat on the pc platform.
3. Cut had a very peculiar behavior at the time, releasing non-existing combos and other made-up stuff.