I would say The You Game is this forum's twitter.technology4617 wrote:Meh, I sorta view RPC as Facebook with more intelligent people and a more tightly-integrated community. I have a Twitter account which I barely use, as I mainly don't really have anything noteworthy to say that I can't say inside of YouTube and this place.
Off Topic
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Re: Off Topic
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87646
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640342
Re: Off Topic
I don't have a Twitter account, I guess the You game is enough for me. 
-
Dart

- Posts: 4950
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:04 pm
- Location: The Realm Of Perpetual Sleepiness
- Tings: 49845
Re: Off Topic
I have to agree with you hunch!
Re: Off Topic
I think there is something like 'nothing to do' on social networks, including Facebook and Twitter. Also I have noticed that social networks are flooded with a thousands of dumb childrem or, whats more worse, dumb adults too.technology4617 wrote:Meh, I sorta view RPC as Facebook with more intelligent people and a more tightly-integrated community. I have a Twitter account which I barely use, as I mainly don't really have anything noteworthy to say that I can't say inside of YouTube and this place.
There is something special about forums, if compare them with social networks. I found all of my real, faithful friends and clever, even wise penpals there. Including my own husband. While *everyone* who were trying to get acquainted with me, were really annoying, disturbing and 'empty' people.
I still have really bad memories stuck in my head forever which were caused by people I met in social networks. I know, it is kinda my fault, I shouldn't reply and ignore/block them instead of speaking, but I always feel guilty when I ignore 'person' for nothing. And as a result, see that it wasn't worth for.
Re: Off Topic
I have twitter account which I mainly use for sharing YT videos 
-
sonicbrawler182

- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 4:09 pm
- Location: Ireland
- Tings: 11810
Re: Off Topic
Forums are always going to be better for intelligent discussion because that is generally their intended purpose. You generate discussion over a particular theme. In this case, RPC was intended for Rayman discussion.
Social networks are literally just for connecting with people. Facebook is for connecting with people whom you actually know personally, so you all know what's going on in each others lives. Twitter is mainly a means for celebrities and figureheads to communicate with fans and such. At least, that's how I have always thought it was.
Social networks are literally just for connecting with people. Facebook is for connecting with people whom you actually know personally, so you all know what's going on in each others lives. Twitter is mainly a means for celebrities and figureheads to communicate with fans and such. At least, that's how I have always thought it was.
-
rolesfamily

- Posts: 10232
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 6:43 pm
- Tings: 74925
Re: Off Topic
Forums are dying it. I've been part of large communities for years, and they're really slowing up. Forums are dinosaurs really, it's all about social networks. Even though they have difference, forums only appeal to a very select few. I use forums just because 'I was brought up' with them.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Off Topic
Among other things. It's the same thing pretty much, just talking with more intelligent people with interests that are more similar to yours.sonicbrawler182 wrote:Forums are always going to be better for intelligent discussion because that is generally their intended purpose. You generate discussion over a particular theme. In this case, RPC was intended for Rayman discussion.
In that case, I really don't have much use for Facebook, as I can communicate with people fine via email, texting, and simple phone calls.sonicbrawler182 wrote:Social networks are literally just for connecting with people. Facebook is for connecting with people whom you actually know personally, so you all know what's going on in each others lives. Twitter is mainly a means for celebrities and figureheads to communicate with fans and such. At least, that's how I have always thought it was.
And I mainly use Twitter for the purpose you said as well, in my case attempting to communicate with the Conker dev team.
I don't think forums really have the ability to dye anything, but I find it sad that they are dying out. The ability to communicate with everyone (including really fucking stupid people) in an unmoderated environment doesn't really appeal to me. I like being on this forum much better. I can talk to people that I feel like I can actually connect with, rather than just posting "cewl stufz" that goes on in my life.rolesfamily wrote:Forums are dying it. I've been part of large communities for years, and they're really slowing up. Forums are dinosaurs really, it's all about social networks. Even though they have difference, forums only appeal to a very select few. I use forums just because 'I was brought up' with them.
-
Dart

- Posts: 4950
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:04 pm
- Location: The Realm Of Perpetual Sleepiness
- Tings: 49845
Re: Off Topic
true enough, but that's because people tend to be too lazy to look for them.rolesfamily wrote:Forums are dying it. I've been part of large communities for years, and they're really slowing up. Forums are dinosaurs really, it's all about social networks. Even though they have difference, forums only appeal to a very select few. I use forums just because 'I was brought up' with them.
-
#Rubber mark#

- Posts: 4999
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere dirty and stinky... Behind you!
- Tings: 83026
Re: Off Topic
Maybe the social networks are bigger because everyone's there, but the forums haven't actually lost users in absolute terms?
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87646
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640342
Re: Off Topic
Microsoft announced their new CEO: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1 ... 2111178636
-
spiraldoor

- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
- Tings: 156600
Re: Off Topic
Kind of a false dichotomy there man.technology4617 wrote:I like being on this forum much better. I can talk to people that I feel like I can actually connect with, rather than just posting "cewl stufz" that goes on in my life.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Off Topic
I enjoy being on Facebook, because I, in fact, also have people I know in real life who I enjoy communicating with. Twitter on the other hand I find entirely pointless unless you're doing something consistent that a lot of people are interested in.
-
technology4617

- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
- Location: Small children.
- Tings: 10
Re: Off Topic
As do about 95% of people on the planet, including myself, and, as I said before, I am quite able to communicate with those people via texting and email, which actually is a much easier way of contacting them, at least for me. I never really had that much interest in Facebook, as I can more easily and reliably communicate with the things mentioned above. Your tone seems to suggest that you think I was shitting on social networks, when, in fact, I was just naming what I prefer.Adsolution wrote:I enjoy being on Facebook, because I, in fact, also have people I know in real life who I enjoy communicating with. Twitter on the other hand I find entirely pointless unless you're doing something consistent that a lot of people are interested in.
Not really, if you think about it for more than a microsecond. Yes, the vast majority of people coming to your Twitter page will most likely be either our friends or those interested in what you post (but almost exclusively your friends, nonetheless), but, in all honesty, forums already have a pre-built community of those that will most likely share your interests, which is much easier for me. It's easier to get to know people, and for them to get to know you, since the community has already been built up.spiraldoor wrote:Kind of a false dichotomy there man.
Re: Off Topic
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Bill-Gat ... 3761.shtmlHunch801 wrote:Microsoft announced their new CEO: (link stripped)
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: Off Topic
So Bill Gates has retired, and one Satya Nadella has become CEO. While my knowledge of this in the grand scheme of things is pretty small, I do wonder what this means now for Microsoft.
Re: Off Topic
Hopefully, some positive changes.
-
Earth Gwee

- Posts: 2689
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: The Glade of Dreams
- Tings: 214195
Re: Off Topic
I do hope this new CEO will bring in better changes for Microsoft's customers. I might be wrong about this, but so far, the only benefits they've made have mostly been for themselves. I mean, after that Xbone fiasco, even if they have made positive changes to it, it still hasn't restored my faith in them.
Re: Off Topic
They can revert those changes anytime they want to with just a simple update and if I am not mistaking, it stands it the contract you must read before using console that they do have full rights to do it. So they can force people with all those changes any time they want.
EDIT: http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/537142/2 ... killer.htm
EDIT: http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/537142/2 ... killer.htm
-
Earth Gwee

- Posts: 2689
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:23 am
- Location: The Glade of Dreams
- Tings: 214195
Re: Off Topic
Yeah, Microsoft sucks. :/


