Rate that signature!
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
5/10, and I was being fairly generous there because Razorbeard at least looks good. But things that bothered me includes :
- The background in general just looks icky and just barely passes for not being eye burning
- I am not sure if the background itself is doing it but you can see pixels floating around both the text and Razorbeard although more noticeable around the text.
- Speaking of the text it's a rather boring font and the colour, again just barely passes for not being eye burning.
I also recommend not saving sigs as JPG/JPEG, that may also by why I see pixelation around the sig.
- The background in general just looks icky and just barely passes for not being eye burning
- I am not sure if the background itself is doing it but you can see pixels floating around both the text and Razorbeard although more noticeable around the text.
- Speaking of the text it's a rather boring font and the colour, again just barely passes for not being eye burning.
I also recommend not saving sigs as JPG/JPEG, that may also by why I see pixelation around the sig.
Re: Rate that signature!
And mine?
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
Hm, again a 5. The lightsaber effect (Which is what i'm assuming it is) doesn't look that great nor am I a fan of "tall" sigs (or rather, sigs which are longer in height than width). The rendering, i'll give you, is not all that bad, as with the idea.
Re: Rate that signature!
Argh!
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
I actually advise against tall signatures. It doesn't matter how wide it is really, it's the height that causes so much unnecessarily scrolling. Your signature literally takes up the entirety of my laptop screen, which is just retarded if you take a step back and think about what a signature actually is.
Also, if you're using Photoshop, I'd suggest applying the Screen blend effect to the lightsaber, so that it takes its transparency from the brightness instead of the alpha.
Also, if you're using Photoshop, I'd suggest applying the Screen blend effect to the lightsaber, so that it takes its transparency from the brightness instead of the alpha.
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: Rate that signature!
8/10incognito wrote:Argh!
Re: Rate that signature!
Im using GIMP, yo !Adsolution wrote:I actually advise against tall signatures. It doesn't matter how wide it is really, it's the height that causes so much unnecessarily scrolling. Your signature literally takes up the entirety of my laptop screen, which is just retarded if you take a step back and think about what a signature actually is.
Also, if you're using Photoshop, I'd suggest applying the Screen blend effect to the lightsaber, so that it takes its transparency from the brightness instead of the alpha.
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
I'm sure that GIMP has something like that too.
Also, can you please make it smaller, or at least shorter? You can probably chop off everything below the arms.
Also, can you please make it smaller, or at least shorter? You can probably chop off everything below the arms.
Re: Rate that signature!
10/10 but the faces boost the up to 13.4
Re: Rate that signature!
I have my Valentine's Day signature ready.
Re: Rate that signature!
Nice, but I liked the one with Toad better 
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: Rate that signature!
My new sign ! 
Rayman makes the finger!
He has no respect !!! é_è
Rayman makes the finger!
He has no respect !!! é_è
-
Adsolution

- Posts: 22233
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 4:55 pm
- Contact:
- Tings: 110541
Re: Rate that signature!
8.5/10 - I usually find GIF signatures, unless subtle, to be really, really distracting, but while still distracting, it fits pretty cozy, and also, Spanu. <3
Amusingly, Spanex actually made that animation because I showed her a little animation I made a couple years ago ( http://www.deviantart.com/download/3088 ... 1392462350 ) and she wanted to give it a try.
Amusingly, Spanex actually made that animation because I showed her a little animation I made a couple years ago ( http://www.deviantart.com/download/3088 ... 1392462350 ) and she wanted to give it a try.
-
Dart

- Posts: 4950
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:04 pm
- Location: The Realm Of Perpetual Sleepiness
- Tings: 49845
Re: Rate that signature!
10/10 Rayman looks so badass
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: Rate that signature!
Thanks you adsolution and darthofthedavros. 
-
Rayman fan2000

- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:55 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
- Tings: 10540
Re: Rate that signature!
dartofthedavros was rating Adsolution's sig, actually.GeekOfTheGame wrote:Thanks you adsolution and darthofthedavros.
Anyway, 7/10.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: Rate that signature!
Hm.
@RayFan2k : 6/10, nothing too unpleasing but Sonic looks too dark (especially in contrast with the BG) and the text is just eh.
@GOTG : 7.5/10, Spanex does fine works but the sig is too big for my liking. Also I find the animation to be far too fast.
@Brad: 9/10, simple but effective, only real issue is that i'm not fond of the blurry effect on the text, perhaps you blurred it a tad too much? It'd also of been nice if it were a light yellow rather than pure white.
@RayFan2k : 6/10, nothing too unpleasing but Sonic looks too dark (especially in contrast with the BG) and the text is just eh.
@GOTG : 7.5/10, Spanex does fine works but the sig is too big for my liking. Also I find the animation to be far too fast.
@Brad: 9/10, simple but effective, only real issue is that i'm not fond of the blurry effect on the text, perhaps you blurred it a tad too much? It'd also of been nice if it were a light yellow rather than pure white.
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: Rate that signature!
ThanksSerza5 wrote:Hm.
@RayFan2k : 6/10, nothing too unpleasing but Sonic looks too dark (especially in contrast with the BG) and the text is just eh.
@GOTG : 7.5/10, Spanex does fine works but the sig is too big for my liking. Also I find the animation to be far too fast.
@Brad: 9/10, simple but effective, only real issue is that i'm not fond of the blurry effect on the text, perhaps you blurred it a tad too much? It'd also of been nice if it
were a light yellow rather than pure white.
Re: Rate that signature!
THAT'S NOT A RATING! :3OldClassicGamer wrote:Nice, but I liked the one with Toad better


