< knows that the "<" symbol is used for legacy reasons, and that it should actually be ">", pointing to our profiles. Perhaps that would make this simpler…
PluMGMK wrote:< knows that the "<" symbol is used for legacy reasons, and that it should actually be ">", pointing to our profiles. Perhaps that would make this simpler…
Nah that's gay.
< is enjoying some mushrooms. Not the psychedelic kind, just regular old mushrooms. Not the psychedelic kind.
PluMGMK wrote:< knows that the "<" symbol is used for legacy reasons, and that it should actually be ">", pointing to our profiles. Perhaps that would make this simpler…
Nah that's gay.
< wonders if that's something specific about the symbol, or just a general derogatory comment…
Look, Bradandez! This is your mistake in a post that you wrote:Here < go…
It's probably supposed to be "Here < goes".
Please follow the rules of the You Game. < really does not want to be mini-modding, but < wants people to follow rules.
PluMGMK wrote:
Adsolution wrote:
PluMGMK wrote:< knows that the "<" symbol is used for legacy reasons, and that it should actually be ">", pointing to our profiles. Perhaps that would make this simpler…
Nah that's gay.
< wonders if that's something specific about the symbol, or just a general derogatory comment…
< had a funny conversation with <'s friend, on the phone. We were talking about <'s friend showing up to summer school wearing a shirt saying "Cock Block", with one of her boobs sticking out, in English class. Speaking of, that guy is fucking insane. Anyways, we talked about plenty of funny shit and it sounds a lot less funny when I explain it, inb4 glazed over replies.
technology4617 wrote:
< wants psychedelic mushrooms right about now.
Fifo wrote:Please follow the rules of the You Game. < really does not want to be mini-modding, but < wants people to follow rules.
This has clearly entered actual mini-modding territory now. "Really wanting something" isn't an excuse for doing it, so don't do it. That is left up to our discretion, and we have reasons for deciding whether or not it's worth it to point something like that out.
PluMGMK wrote:< wonders if that's something specific about the symbol, or just a general derogatory comment…
No worries, < was just making a derogatory comment. No special implications!