Rayman 1

For discussions about the Rayman series.
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.

Which version is your favourite?

Jaguar
10
4%
PC
56
23%
PlayStation
143
59%
Saturn
15
6%
Game Boy Colour
4
2%
Game Boy Advance
6
2%
DSi
9
4%
 
Total votes: 243

beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

technology4617 wrote:
beebo44 wrote:Brad is entitled to his opinion and is entitled to stating said opinion.
Lovely how you always feel the need to reply even when you don't fully understand the conversation at hand or my stance in it.
Lovely how you just assume that I don't know what the conversation is about and proceed to act pretentious.

The posts from Brad that you pointed out are to me very obviously made in a joking manner. Maybe it's just that I've had more conversations with Brad and know that that's what he's like but honestly it seems pretty obvious that he's not being seriously hateful.

EDIT: This is just extremely stupid.
technology4617 wrote:You can have your opinion, but don't force it upon others, especially if you're in the minority.
Is this to say that the minority can't be right, or that their voices don't deserve to be heard? A large majority isn't always correct just because their influence is larger than the minority.
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: Rayman 1

Post by Bradandez »

Oh no! This fighting started because of me! *sobs*

But seriously, all the posts you quoted were made during Record's Day. That means I wrote what I felt in a very jackassy, overly exaggerated way. I made them just to get some posts out of this thread while staying on topic. No one likes a spammer but I kinda did with those first three posts/ Hypocrisy for the win! Maybe later in the near future I'll make a more educated criticism on why I dislike Rayman 1 very much. I'm not here to babble but to express myself and be really honest, when I am not in a mischievous mood.
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

Fighting? I'm not fighting with anyone, just standing my ground to prove a point. :oops2:
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: Rayman 1

Post by Bradandez »

Eh, point taken. I don't understand, I just love pissing people off. :hinhin:
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

Yes well it appears you succeeded in your mission as is evident from tech :P
Bradandez
Annetta Fish
Posts: 18589
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:50 am
Tings: 137530

Re: Rayman 1

Post by Bradandez »

Well I wasn't trying to piss him off with recent posts, but with my Record Day posts... yeah I was trying to piss members off.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

Bradandez wrote:Oh no! This fighting started because of me! *sobs*

But seriously, all the posts you quoted were made during Record's Day. That means I wrote what I felt in a very jackassy, overly exaggerated way. I made them just to get some posts out of this thread while staying on topic. No one likes a spammer but I kinda did with those first three posts/ Hypocrisy for the win! Maybe later in the near future I'll make a more educated criticism on why I dislike Rayman 1 very much. I'm not here to babble but to express myself and be really honest, when I am not in a mischievous mood.
Forcing your opinion upon others is still forcing your opinion on others regardless of the context. There are better things you can spend your Record Day time doing, that would be less likely others. Intent often matters little if the result is the same. Case in point, I basically understood your reasoning for posting what you did (yesh beebo44), but it was still irritating regardless to someone that had just spent a total of six hours attempting a no death run of the game. It's important to note where you are and when you've gone too far when making jokes that can potentially come across as offensive.

If you want an example of a similar fuckup of mine, in a speedrunner's Twitch chat, I jokingly insulted one of the other runners of the game, which caused the speedrunner I was watching to get annoyed and the person I insulted's feelings to get hurt. In this case, my intent mattered little, since the outcome was still the same as if I had outright insulted him. And a joke that might have been fine in one context wasn't in this case.
Bradandez wrote:Well I wasn't trying to piss him off with recent posts, but with my Record Day posts... yeah I was trying to piss members off.
Again, depending on how far you go with it, this could've been a nice bit of harmless trolling (note the word "harmless"), but, yeah, you went a bit too far with it.



Not to get off on this tangent, as its level of stupid is almost unnerving, and thus it isn't worth taking it any further than this. But anyway:
beebo44 wrote:
technology4617 wrote:
beebo44 wrote:Brad is entitled to his opinion and is entitled to stating said opinion.
Lovely how you always feel the need to reply even when you don't fully understand the conversation at hand or my stance in it.
Lovely how you just assume that I don't know what the conversation is about and proceed to act pretentious.
You have misinterpreted me on several occasions (e.g., RIGHT FUCKING NOW), even admitting to it sometimes, so don't act all offended just because I bluntly pointed out something entirely accurate. :roll:
beebo44 wrote:The posts from Brad that you pointed out are to me very obviously made in a joking manner. Maybe it's just that I've had more conversations with Brad and know that that's what he's like but honestly it seems pretty obvious that he's not being seriously hateful.
OHHHH! So since they're presented in a joking matter, that instantly makes it OK and not what I described previously. Shit, why don't I make a bunch of racist jokes in a crowd of black people? As long as its intent wasn't to be offensive, that'd be fucking badass, right?
beebo44 wrote:EDIT: This is just extremely stupid.
technology4617 wrote:You can have your opinion, but don't force it upon others, especially if you're in the minority.
Is this to say that the minority can't be right, or that their voices don't deserve to be heard? A large majority isn't always correct just because their influence is larger than the minority.
Are you really that asinine to misinterpret my post in that way? I was talking about how one should conduct themselves in such as situation to avoid offending others, not implying that one side was necessarily more right than the other. If you want yet another example of you misinterpreting my posts, look no further.
beebo44 wrote:Yes well it appears you succeeded in your mission as is evident from tech :P
YA LOL HE TROLED ME G00D YUP LOL I TOTALLY WASN'T TRYING TO MAKE A POINT OR ANYTHING :P :P :P :P pppppppp

Go join a conversation that you're actually mature enough to take part in. :roll:
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

Honestly I don't even fucking care anymore tech I can't be bothered to dissect your post and make an argument because it's pointless. Think what you want about me, even if it's completely incorrect and you're making assumptions on someone you don't know. I really couldn't fucking care less at this point because you're just proving that you're being an arrogant and pretentious asshole. You are the one not acting maturely and I refuse to hold a conversation with someone like you.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

My assumptions are based entirely off of my experiences with you, which so far have been less than pleasant. Do you honestly people to give you a polite response if you tell them that they're being "stupid" and "pretentious"?

Also:
beebo44 wrote:Think what you want about me, even if it's completely incorrect and you're making assumptions on someone you don't know.
beebo44 wrote:I refuse to hold a conversation with someone like you.
Hypocrite.
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

Firstly, you're the one who was being sarcastic towards me when I didn't offend you or anyone else and I was simply trying to provide my input on the situation, for your information I have in fact followed the conversation you were talking about with Brad and I felt that my input could be constructive. Secondly, not once did I call you stupid. I said that one thing you had written was stupid and it was, at least the way you worded it. Thirdly, like you're not a hypocrite. Read your previous post and see how many times you openly insulted me instead of attempting a conversation where we can reach an agreement. That doesn't seem very 'mature', now does it? I am not trying to make you dislike me and indeed if you had began your conversation with me like a mature human being then maybe we wouldn't be at the point we are now. As it stands right now, this is a conversation I do not wish to be a part of anymore because it has nothing to do with anything and is achieving nothing.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

beebo44 wrote:Firstly, you're the one who was being sarcastic towards me when I didn't offend you or anyone else and I was simply trying to provide my input on the situation, for your information I have in fact followed the conversation you were talking about with Brad and I felt that my input could be constructive.
technology4617 wrote:You have misinterpreted me on several occasions (e.g., RIGHT FUCKING NOW), even admitting to it sometimes, so don't act all offended just because I bluntly pointed out something entirely accurate. :roll:
beebo44 wrote:Secondly, not once did I call you stupid.
technology4617 wrote:if you tell them that they're being "stupid" and "pretentious"?
beebo44 wrote:I said that one thing you had written was stupid and it was, at least the way you worded it.
technology4617 wrote:I was talking about how one should conduct themselves in such as situation to avoid offending others, not implying that one side was necessarily more right than the other.
beebo44 wrote:Thirdly, like you're not a hypocrite. Read your previous post and see how many times you openly insulted me instead of attempting a conversation where we can reach an agreement. That doesn't seem very 'mature', now does it?
technology4617 wrote:Do you honestly people to give you a polite response if you tell them that they're being "stupid" and "pretentious"?
See what I mean about you missing stuff?

Also, so what if I'm being hypocritical? That doesn't mean you aren't, or that you have a valid excuse for openly contradicting yourself. Are you stooping to my level, in that case?
beebo44 wrote:I am not trying to make you dislike me
I don't have any reason to outright dislike you, nor do I, but that doesn't mean I think you're right.
beebo44 wrote:and indeed if you had began your conversation with me like a mature human being then maybe we wouldn't be at the point we are now.
:boon:
beebo44 wrote:As it stands right now, this is a conversation I do not wish to be a part of anymore because it has nothing to do with anything and is achieving nothing.
technology4617 wrote:Not to get off on this tangent, as its level of stupid is almost unnerving, and thus it isn't worth taking it any further than this.
Your last sentiment is definitely agreeable, and it really would have been awesome if you saw me agreeing with it five posts go.

And, again:
beebo44 wrote:Read your previous post and see how many times you openly insulted me instead of attempting a conversation where we can reach an agreement. That doesn't seem very 'mature', now does it?
beebo44 wrote:like you're not a hypocrite
Hypocrite.
Last edited by technology4617 on Sun Aug 03, 2014 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
RibShark
Ninja Teensy
Posts: 1661
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:03 pm
Contact:
Tings: 3292

Re: Rayman 1

Post by RibShark »

Technology, the only person now continuing this argument is you. Brad acknowledged that he posted those things for record day, but you decided to argue with him about it still. Beeb decided to step in, and you took all his arguments and shot them down for no reason. If you just leave it here, the argument can stop and we can actually talk about Rayman 1, as the topic is meant to be for.
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

Why are you still dragging this on? I will admit that I have fucked up a bit if you admit you have as well, can we leave it at that? I really don't want to continue beating a dead horse.

Edit: RibShark ninja'd me but is essentially saying what I am trying to say too.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

I don't want anyone to reply to this and drag this out further, but this really needs to be addressed:
RibShark wrote:Technology, the only person now continuing this argument is you. Brad acknowledged that he posted those things for record day, but you decided to argue with him about it still.
Brad explained why he posted what he posted, and I gave my thoughts on the matter, and explained in further detail my reaction to what he wrote. That can't technically qualify as arguing. Did you read my post?
RibShark wrote:Beeb decided to step in, and you took all his arguments and shot them down for no reason.
Beebo44 was outright wrong in what he was telling me off for, which I explained, and then he proceeded to outright make fun of my reaction to Brad's posts. I'd hardly call this "no reason."
RibShark wrote:If you just leave it here, the argument can stop and we can actually talk about Rayman 1, as the topic is meant to be for.
"Yeah, you're fucking wrong and you should feel bad, because you're a fucking cunt. Let's drop this now."
beebo44 wrote:Why are you still dragging this on? I will admit that I have fucked up a bit if you admit you have as well, can we leave it at that? I really don't want to continue beating a dead horse.
For the third time, I'm fine with letting this go if we drop it on an even note. You can't falsely accuse me of stuff and then expect me to drop it. That's plain paradoxical. :boon:
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

beebo44 wrote:Why are you still dragging this on? I will admit that I have fucked up a bit if you admit you have as well, can we leave it at that? I really don't want to continue beating a dead horse.
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

The above was literally an answer to that very question.
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

And yet you still dragged it on when it could've been a concise response and we could've moved on, and then you also said that you "don't want anyone to reply to this" as if you were right in every way and that we should not provide a counter argument. I basically admitted to making a couple of mistakes in my post and you continued on with the argument. You also put words in RibShark's mouth, he was just trying to provide some constructive input and you straight away shot him down.

Also, I didn't tell you off. As I stated in a previous post,
beebo44 wrote:I felt that my input could be constructive
Fifo
Razorwife
Posts: 10771
Joined: Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:08 pm
Location: rm –rf /*
Contact:
Tings: 104505

Re: Rayman 1

Post by Fifo »

Stop it!
technology4617
Antitoon
Posts: 2340
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 6:25 am
Location: Small children.
Tings: 10

Re: Rayman 1

Post by technology4617 »

beebo44 wrote:And yet you still dragged it on when it could've been a concise response and we could've moved on, and then you also said that you "don't want anyone to reply to this" as if you were right in every way and that we should not provide a counter argument. I basically admitted to making a couple of mistakes in my post and you continued on with the argument. You also put words in RibShark's mouth, he was just trying to provide some constructive input and you straight away shot him down.

Also, I didn't tell you off. As I stated in a previous post,
beebo44 wrote:I felt that my input could be constructive
Literally how can you expect me to "drop it" when you outright refuse to do so? You keep making stupidly biased and inaccurate recollections of past events, painting me as this pretentious "bad guy". No reasonable person would drop this under such circumstances.
beebo44
Olympia
Posts: 3448
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 11:27 am
Location: Australia, home to all things deadly!
Tings: 31100

Re: Rayman 1

Post by beebo44 »

I'm not trying to paint you as a bad guy I am trying to end this useless argument. I have admitted to my mistakes, why can't you do the same and we can move past this?
Post Reply