rolesfamily wrote:The reason for 'banning' people is bound to come from an actual trait of their character. Or the reason is bound to be from something they've done/said/are.
Yes, and it should be a trait that you could actually picture some idiot getting upset over. For instance, there is literally nothing upsetting about owning a Murfy rank, especially considering that the people who would be banning you created that rank. For the mock reaction I gave to Imco's signature, for instance, that's not even a super uncommon reaction for some people - look at Feminist Frequency. Now maybe them having a Murfy rank isn't the sole reason you want to ban them, maybe the Murfy rank combined with a few other completely unrelated but coincidental traits all work together to make it seem as if he's part of the Illuminati or something. That one's a little complicated, but that's the whole point,
be creative, and a part of that also means being creative enough to assume the role of hyper-offendable or paranoid, power-hungry fool who landed an elite position.
Fifo wrote:Hey, you aren’t the owner of this game. Don’t enforce rules.
Hey, you aren't in charge of maintaining this forum's quality; if you aren't going to enforce any quality rules, I will. Without setting any rules that define some kind of a challenge, something you clearly have no intent on doing, it doesn't even fit the definition of a "game", it's just random nonsense.
rolesfamily wrote:It's clearly turning out to be a fun thread, it's got super popular already.
Aye, but nothing I'm suggesting would diminish the fun factor. If anything, it'd make the thread a whole lot more funny to read in the long run.
For note, I'm not trying to cause an argument here, I'm just catching hold of the thread before it becomes an utter spamfest.
(you've added a solution!)
