tech, enough. In the past, there were some conflicts, which seemed to make you appear like a nasty person and you think that's all we see you as now. That's not true. Every time that we use one of your posts as an example, you shoot into the defensive, calling quoting you 'unnecessary' and saying "Why would you quote me if you might as well have quoted one of the others?"technology4617 wrote:It's also admittedly somewhat hard to feel that way when you went and singled me out for what I in no way see as a legitimate enough reason, the aforementioned "real differences" being no greater than Adsolution and Shrooblord's posts, for example.
We're not making an example out of you. We're simply quoting what you said, taking your statements as an example. If you don't want people to respond to the way you speak, then don't. Yes, saer may as well have taken Addy's or my posts as examples, but the fact of the matter is that he didn't - he took yours. And that's fine. That's not because it was you, that's not because we think you're an asshole or the one who makes his arguements in the most harmful way - that's just coincidence, I'm sure.
And saer
That's exactly what I meant with 'ganging up on him' and I'm pretty sure we all got that. If someone voices their opinion and others' voice theirs, you shouldn't, as a person, feel discouraged in voicing your own too, just because it happens to coincide with what others said too. You can agree with people. You can discuss with those you disagree with and try to see why they have the opinions they have and how they logically support those opinions (why you'd want to is a whole different matter that I'll leave for another conversation).saerleiya wrote:I'm not talking about 'ganging-up' against someone. I want to clarify: even if you are simply expressing what you think about the matter, that fact it's piling up can be rather harsh even if it's not meant to be like that.
But since OCG already said he won't change his mind to begin with and clearly has no problem discussing things with others, see here:
, I feel like we shouldn't be making such a big point about this. OCG said what he wanted to say and wanted us to do the same. We did, he read it, he replied, that's that. He didn't feel anything wrong with our replies and we didn't with his (other than having a different opinion and not understanding how he reinforces his exactly).OldClassicGamer wrote:I shall be always expecting same every time I post unpopular statement and I am aware of that. I simply found the news article about Marvel planning to find who leaked trailer, decided to share it and say how I feel.
There's no need to defend someone who isn't being attacked.
There's no reason to defend yourself against someone who's not attacking you.
I also didn't really think that the conversation would have gone into this tangent when I responded, either.
