Rayman Pirate-Community

First 3 games: Great.
New games: Bullshit.

Just like the Spyro series.

yes!

first 4 games: great

martin0128 wrote:yes!

first 4 games: great

Four? The Wrath of Cortex does not deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as its predecessors. Perhaps you’re referring to Crash Team Racing?

sorry

first 3 games

The Crash Bandicoot the Wrath of Cortex the prime

yes!

My favourite is Crash 2, CTR and Crash N-Tranced.

mine is Crash 3

Same here, ''Crash Bandicoot: Warped'' was also the first CB game i've played.

My first played Crash game also was Crash 3.

I quite like the classical 3 games.

Rsandee wrote:Same here, ''Crash Bandicoot: Warped'' was also the first CB game i've played.

I played the original three in reverse order. Same for Spyro.

I have playen all, of the console versions.

spiraldoor wrote:

martin0128 wrote:yes!

first 4 games: great

Four? The Wrath of Cortex does not deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as its predecessors. Perhaps you’re referring to Crash Team Racing?

STFU Spiral. We already had this conversation.

My favourite Crash game is Twinsanity and, since we're on the subject, my favourite Spyro game is Enter the Dragonfly, then Year of the Dragon.

iHeckler9 wrote:STFU Spiral. We already had this conversation.

What are you talking about? The fellow seemed to be confused about the quality of the Crash Bandicoot games. I don’t recall having ‘this conversation’ with you before (though I was not talking to you, which renders it a moot point). Perhaps you are referring to this thread? That one ended quite badly for you, didn’t it?

iHeckler9 wrote:My favourite Crash game is Twinsanity and, since we're on the subject, my favourite Spyro game is Enter the Dragonfly, then Year of the Dragon.

I find this remarkable. The original Spyro trilogy received great critical acclaim whereas Enter the Dragonfly is regarded as quite a bad game in general.

"Quite bad in general''.
It's abysmal, really... Gamespot gave it a 2.8.
I've seen how much bugs that game has.... but if it just didn't have so much bugs.... it could actually be good.

spiraldoor wrote:

iHeckler9 wrote:STFU Spiral. We already had this conversation.

What are you talking about? The fellow seemed to be confused about the quality of the Crash Bandicoot games. I don’t recall having ‘this conversation’ with you before (though I was not talking to you, which renders it a moot point). Perhaps you are referring to this thread? That one ended quite badly for you, didn’t it?

iHeckler9 wrote:My favourite Crash game is Twinsanity and, since we're on the subject, my favourite Spyro game is Enter the Dragonfly, then Year of the Dragon.

I find this remarkable. The original Spyro trilogy received great critical acclaim whereas Enter the Dragonfly is regarded as quite a bad game in general.

It didn't 'end badly' for me. It just ended with me saying it was rhetorical and you calling me stupid.

And I know ETD is a bad game. It was the first Spyro game I got.

iHeckler9 wrote:It didn't 'end badly' for me. It just ended with me saying it was rhetorical and you calling me stupid.

No, you made a fool of yourself. You posted several pointless, illogical and self-contradictory messages before leaving the discussion without a word.

spiraldoor wrote:

iHeckler9 wrote:It didn't 'end badly' for me. It just ended with me saying it was rhetorical and you calling me stupid.

No, you made a fool of yourself. You posted several pointless, illogical and self-contradictory messages before leaving the discussion without a word.

I told you it was a rhetorical question and you started beating me up. Since a mod was on your side I had to surrender. SURRENDER, not leave. They are two different things.

iHeckler9 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:

iHeckler9 wrote:It didn't 'end badly' for me. It just ended with me saying it was rhetorical and you calling me stupid.

No, you made a fool of yourself. You posted several pointless, illogical and self-contradictory messages before leaving the discussion without a word.

I told you it was a rhetorical question and you started beating me up. Since a mod was on your side I had to surrender. SURRENDER, not leave. They are two different things.

This is nonsense for several reasons. Firstly, having a moderator disagree with you obviously does not mean you must ‘SURRENDER’. Note the dozens of times I have stood up to defend my views against those of the moderators. Anyone, including you, could easily have done the same. You are clearly making excuses. Secondly, when DesLife pointed out your stupidity, you responded by saying ‘Angry now’, not by ‘surrendering’. You then continued to respond to my posts for some time, until your became caught in the web of your own self-contradictory nonsense that you could no longer think of anything to say. Claiming that you were forced to make an unexplained ‘surrender’ because DesLife had said you were stupid seven posts ago is quite silly; this is clearly another excuse. Here is the exact moment when you contradicted yourself so fundamentally that you could no longer continue to participate in the discussion:

spiraldoor wrote:

iHeckler9 wrote:

spiraldoor wrote:Could you please explain to me exactly how I was supposed to know that this was a ‘rhetorical question’? Seems like a bit of a stretch to me.

You weren't supposed to know. That's why most people say after somebody has answered it 'It was rhetorical.'

You’re saying I should have ignored your question because it was ‘rhetorical’, yet you also say that I was not supposed to know that it was ‘rhetorical’?

So where’s your brilliant logical counter-argument? You know, the one you totally would have posted if DesLife hadn’t forced you to surrender? That one?