TeensieKing wrote:I think the worlds are too much like Rayman 1.They have almost the same themes: Forest,Food,Mountains and Picture were already in the first game but food was in a different style,remaining only the desert world as the only original world
The way Rayman Origins has taken levels from the original is probably the best thing that has ever happened to the series.
Hunchman801 wrote:TeensieKing wrote:I think that: Those anmes are worlds.
That's probably the case:
Gamespot wrote:Trickier still was a level called Don't Burn Dinner, which was set within the Gourmand Lands, featuring deadly knife-throwing chefs and an abundance of cocktail wieners.
Don’t Burn Dinner sounds like a part of the Infernal Kitchen, which we know is part of the food world (which may be called the Gourmand Lands). Maybe every single level in the game will have its own name? That would be about sixty, which makes sense to me, as ‘Don’t Burn Dinner’ is a less than spectacular name and seems to be part of the much-better-named Infernal Kitchen anyway. Moody Clouds is probably a single level too. The Desert of Didgeridoos sounds like it will be an expansive environment; perhaps it will comprise a half or a third of all the music-world levels.
ikke471 wrote:Desert is music so no it isn't original -_-
The desert is completely different from the Band Land levels in the original game. Just how ‘original’ do you want this game to be?
Mr. Dark Thingamajig wrote:they have changed polokus really a lot
but i like him
It has been confirmed that Polokus is a shape-shifter. He will manifest himself as a rock, a tree, and presumably many other things. The form we saw in Rayman 2 is just one of them, and may even appear in Origins. The lack of a bubble pipe in that version is plainly a continuity error – there’s no use in trying to gloss over it or explain it. I’m glad they evaluated a strong and recognisable design as being more important than slavish faithfulness to the earlier games.
sergiomonty wrote:Oh no, not again. Just because a character wears dark clothes doesn't mean it's mr dark!!! first the teensy with the top hat, and now the intellectual-like teensy? guys, just face it, mr dark doesn't even appear to have any relation to the main story.
You mean the Teensy in the second trailer? The one with a cloak that’s blue on the outside and purple on the inside (like Mr Dark’s), and wears a hat (like Mr Dark’s), and stands on a hilltop (like Mr Dark) while commanding legions of Darktoons (like Mr Dark)? Bearing in mind the confirmation that Mr Dark’s origins will be explained in this game? When you say ‘intellectual-looking Teensy’, do you mean the innocent Teensy whose pre-Dark creation is impressionistically depicted in the trailer? The one who has the same locks of grey hair as the Teensy in the second trailer (the one who’s Mr Dark)? The one who wears a bright blue cape exactly the same shade as that seen in the original game (being worn by a certain Mr Dark)? You are in denial, my friend. The evidence is overwhelming. Mr Dark is a Teensy, whether you like it or not.
El Dango wrote:Is Granny supposed to be the predecessor of Mr. Dark, or does she work for him?
This is the story of Mr Dark’s origins, so I would say that the granny is the game’s villain and final boss. Mr Dark will definitely be in there somewhere, though.
This reminds me: Do we have any official source calling her Betilla? I'm not questioning her being Betilla, but maybe they renamed her, like Polokus.
).
