Talk:Henchman 1000: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::I don't believe it is an official name. If both of you don't mind, I'll take it off. And about the "needing more text", I can remind that nothing much is known about Henchman 1000. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC) | :::I don't believe it is an official name. If both of you don't mind, I'll take it off. And about the "needing more text", I can remind that nothing much is known about Henchman 1000. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 12:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Oh, an Onet blog, I should have bloody guessed. --[[User:Cairnie|Cairnie]] 15:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC) | ::Oh, an Onet blog, I should have bloody guessed. --[[User:Cairnie|Cairnie]] 15:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Older version? == | |||
:Does the English manual of RM really says that the Henchmen 1000 are older versions of the Henchmen 800? | |||
:That's odd, the French manual says the opposite: The Henchman 1000 is presented as a "most perfected version of the robo-pirate". | |||
:Could it be a mistranslation?--[[User:Boomboleros7|Boomboleros7]] 18:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
::Possibly, given the Terminator reference, the 1000 is supposed to be newer than the 800, it'd make sense for it to be the case here. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 14:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC) | |||