Template talk:Rayman series: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:::::::Alright, just tweaked with percentages, and it's done the trick --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 13:13, 15 April 2014 (CEST) | :::::::Alright, just tweaked with percentages, and it's done the trick --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 13:13, 15 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
::::::::I just have a suggestion. Games like Rayman Gold and others for example aren't exactly remakes and/or ports. I would classify them as re-releases. Would you mind if I added the word? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:19, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | ::::::::I just have a suggestion. Games like Rayman Gold and others for example aren't exactly remakes and/or ports. I would classify them as re-releases. Would you mind if I added the word? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:19, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
:::::::::I see what you mean, though perhaps we should add another group for re-releases, as opposed to adding it into the (already quite long) heading?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 01:38, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | |||