Template talk:Rabbids series: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST) | :I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST) | ::Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
:::On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have [[Rabbids (series)]] as one of the spin-off links?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST) | |||