Talk:Jacquouille: Difference between revisions

Line 28:

:::::::Anyway, I understand that the “Jacquouilles” are still Lividstones, but my point is that unlike the aforementioned little Livingstones (in their case, they’re half the Livingstones’ normal sizes and twice as annoying), there are no physical or functional attributes that are particularly distinct from the Origins Lividstones that would warrant their own article. Now sure, if they charged at the player, used shields, and sometimes had parachutes, then they might be able to have their own article. Oh wait… yeah this is a difficult subject to debate, even for me. You can set up the poll if you wish, but I’m not sure enough people would care about this matter to make as big of a stink about it as we have over the past month or so. -RayGamer99

::::::::So, according to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zisQWDnI-gg this footage], it appears that ''[[Rayman Legends Retold]]'' has definitively decided to call these guys "Livingstones" rather than "Jacquouilles," just as Polokus intended! Not sure if this means that this page will get merged back into the main [[Livingstone]] article or not (I, for one, would hope so; if so, we could still make a note of their internal name on the Legends section of the main page), but it feels good that they went with that name. Despite my best efforts, I never did get used to calling the bandit Livingstones that internal name, so it's nice to know that I won't have to do that anymore! --[[User:RayGamer99|RayGamer99]] ([[User talk:RayGamer99|talk]]) 00:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:25, 10 September 2024 view source RayGamer99 (talk \| contribs) 4,782 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:34, 10 June 2026 view source RayGamer99 (talk \| contribs) 4,782 edits →Switch it back Newer edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:::::::Anyway, I understand that the “Jacquouilles” are still Lividstones, but my point is that unlike the aforementioned little Livingstones (in their case, they’re half the Livingstones’ normal sizes and twice as annoying), there are no physical or functional attributes that are particularly distinct from the Origins Lividstones that would warrant their own article. Now sure, if they charged at the player, used shields, and sometimes had parachutes, then they might be able to have their own article. Oh wait… yeah this is a difficult subject to debate, even for me. You can set up the poll if you wish, but I’m not sure enough people would care about this matter to make as big of a stink about it as we have over the past month or so. -RayGamer99		:::::::Anyway, I understand that the “Jacquouilles” are still Lividstones, but my point is that unlike the aforementioned little Livingstones (in their case, they’re half the Livingstones’ normal sizes and twice as annoying), there are no physical or functional attributes that are particularly distinct from the Origins Lividstones that would warrant their own article. Now sure, if they charged at the player, used shields, and sometimes had parachutes, then they might be able to have their own article. Oh wait… yeah this is a difficult subject to debate, even for me. You can set up the poll if you wish, but I’m not sure enough people would care about this matter to make as big of a stink about it as we have over the past month or so. -RayGamer99

			::::::::So, according to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zisQWDnI-gg this footage], it appears that ''[[Rayman Legends Retold]]'' has definitively decided to call these guys "Livingstones" rather than "Jacquouilles," just as Polokus intended! Not sure if this means that this page will get merged back into the main [[Livingstone]] article or not (I, for one, would hope so; if so, we could still make a note of their internal name on the Legends section of the main page), but it feels good that they went with that name. Despite my best efforts, I never did get used to calling the bandit Livingstones that internal name, so it's nice to know that I won't have to do that anymore! --[[User:RayGamer99\|RayGamer99]] ([[User talk:RayGamer99\|talk]]) 00:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC)