Talk:Dark Rayman: Difference between revisions

Line 26:

:::Role: Enemy in ''Rayman 4''

:::Justification: We can't tell if it was the evil clone of R1, Arena or a new character. We should speak about him on the disambiguation page.

::::Indeed, though this approach outright states that DarkRay in Legends is ShadowRay, which is never firmly established in a title, the only similarity is in their appearance. If we're to be less speculative, they should be kept separate. The second issue is with Raymesis, presently we're presenting him as someone who may be connected to Rayman 1 BadRay, and Polokus' statement in Origins as either confusion or a hint. Prior to Legend's release, we had BadRay as the playable character. But then with Legends he was shown as Raymesis, and another DarkRay was shown. Back when that happened, I was of opinion that this was a new DarkRay, but even so, it fits the context of what the original DarkRay article protrayed him as, a spell, not a sentient character. I think that's what is murking the waters with Raymesis, separating a character from a spell. A spell that seemingly expired too.

::::DarkRay from Arena is simple, that stay separate. Then for Rayman 4 DarkRay, while it's probable they were intending for him to be the same as Rayman 1 BadRay, it was never confirmed. As such, I guess the best thing to do is as you've stated, having them on the disambig page.

::::With that in mind, we effectively have "BadRay (Evil Spell)," "DarkRay (Arena)," "Raymesis," "ShadowRay," and "DarkRay (Rayaman 4 cancelled)"

::::--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 20:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 :::Role: Enemy in ''Rayman 4''
 :::Justification: We can't tell if it was the evil clone of R1, Arena or a new character. We should speak about him on the disambiguation page.
+::::Indeed, though this approach outright states that DarkRay in Legends is ShadowRay, which is never firmly established in a title, the only similarity is in their appearance. If we're to be less speculative, they should be kept separate. The second issue is with Raymesis, presently we're presenting him as someone who may be connected to Rayman 1 BadRay, and Polokus' statement in Origins as either confusion or a hint. Prior to Legend's release, we had BadRay as the playable character. But then with Legends he was shown as Raymesis, and another DarkRay was shown. Back when that happened, I was of opinion that this was a new DarkRay, but even so, it fits the context of what the original DarkRay article protrayed him as, a spell, not a sentient character. I think that's what is murking the waters with Raymesis, separating a character from a spell. A spell that seemingly expired too.
+::::DarkRay from Arena is simple, that stay separate. Then for Rayman 4 DarkRay, while it's probable they were intending for him to be the same as Rayman 1 BadRay, it was never confirmed. As such, I guess the best thing to do is as you've stated, having them on the disambig page.
+::::With that in mind, we effectively have "BadRay (Evil Spell)," "DarkRay (Arena)," "Raymesis," "ShadowRay," and "DarkRay (Rayaman 4 cancelled)"
+::::--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 20:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)