Template talk:Rabbids series
Separation or Accumulation?
I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --
Haruka 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)
- I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —Spiraldoor
01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
- Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --
Haruka 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
- On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have Rabbids (series) as one of the spin-off links?--
21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
- Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —Spiraldoor 21:32, 18 April 2014 (CEST)
- And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --Haruka 12:47, 19 April 2014 (CEST)
- And that's why we cannot do anything to those three titles. --
- Terrible though they might be, the first three Rabbids games have Rayman in the title and feature Rayman as a character, along with other Rayman series elements. It seems disingenuous not to include them in the template. —Spiraldoor
- On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have Rabbids (series) as one of the spin-off links?--
- Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --
Single Mini-game page?
Excuse me if this isn't the right place to put this but-
So i've been looking at the "articles that need work" section and I spotted pages like these : http://raymanpc.com/wiki/en/Bunnies_Are_Oversensitive
Personally I think that unless there is much much more content we could add to the individual pages then we should move them all into a single page for the mini-games, not necessarily on the game page but on a separate page on their own so that instead of having loads of tiny articles we can have one massive one.