His score was removed as it was deemed illegitimate. Reading his three posts makes it clear he was a troll.Cut wrote:aaaaaaand it's gone. WTF, this community is hilarious
I would not look at his behaviour as a reflection on this community.
His score was removed as it was deemed illegitimate. Reading his three posts makes it clear he was a troll.Cut wrote:aaaaaaand it's gone. WTF, this community is hilarious
Cut wrote:aaaaaaand it's gone. WTF, this community is hilarious
sfn42 wrote:What happened to giving someone the benefit of the doubt and actually giving them a chance to explain/prove whether it was a legitimate score or not? Also, what happened to actually discussing decisions about the HoF in the scoring community and not making autocratic decisions?

Yeah thanks to clowns like you.Cut wrote:aaaaaaand it's gone. WTF, this community is hilarious

would you dare to elaborate? imho i would deem your claims to be a quite far-fetched theory, but i'm always up for some entertainmenttimoo wrote:Yeah thanks to clowns like you.Cut wrote:aaaaaaand it's gone. WTF, this community is hilarious
Cut insulted our dear community, that is all of us, most of whom have nothing to do with the matter you're discussing and don't give the slightest fuck about it. As for the entertainment I think your friend is already providing it.Mountain Goat wrote:would you dare to elaborate? imho i would deem your claims to be a quite far-fetched theory, but i'm always up for some entertainment
That's the point. Scoring has expanded so much that such a score is possible and even if it wasn't possible based on public knowledge, we should at least consider the possibility that someone found something new. To put into perspective, two years ago we thought the maximum to be around 859k. To remove a score based on someone solely being a troll, an opinion which was based on 1 (!) post without even giving the player a chance to explain himself, is an atrocity. I'd like to know who was responsible for this decision. We've all been hearing about these ominous HoF-Mods (especially from MandM), but it is unclear for me who these people are.Cut wrote:896.969 (sixtyniiiiiiine). Which is indeed possible
I seem to recall that there was a list somewhere (sadly, I forgot where to find it). Also according to my memory, Xenon should be one of the moderators, I guess?sfn42 wrote: We've all been hearing about these ominous HoF-Mods (especially from MandM), but it is unclear for me who these people are.
I assume you were not directing this at anyone specific, but if I may talk for myself:sfn42 wrote: That's the point. Scoring has expanded so much that such a score is possible and even if it wasn't possible based on public knowledge, we should at least consider the possibility that someone found something new. To put into perspective, two years ago we thought the maximum to be around 859k. To remove a score based on someone solely being a troll, an opinion which was based on 1 (!) post without even giving the player a chance to explain himself, is an atrocity.
memberlist.php?mode=group&g=415Maz wrote:I seem to recall that there was a list somewhere (sadly, I forgot where to find it).
A problem for some, convenient for others.Cut wrote:99% is not 100% and that's kinda the problem in this case.
so yes my points is possiblemandM81 wrote:As mentioned above, IPG players can with the present knowledge of the game pass 920k.