SOTM#170 - Rayman Legends

CHRdutch said:
RecordDay_SOTM.gif
lol îlumînâtî xd
 
Hoozang said:
Am I late to submit my signature? Because there are no entries and the title says "Voting Time"
Nah I'm just a lazy butt who doesn't tend to change the title even when the contest ended.

The next one however, I just decided will be starting tomorrow, and only when I say it's time to start.
 
I'm about to change all the stuff but i'll accept submissions now.

Deadline is the 21st. Just to add a bit more to this the next scoreboard rewards will be next month so maybe you'll have a chance to be added to that? Hopefully so! It'd be nice to see new people on there.

EDIT : I also hope you all enjoy me entering the sig I currently have.
 
Serza5 said:
That sig's 274 pixels in height, which is to say over the height limit.
I'll go through my sig making progress and see where it goes wrong because I swear I've been submitting oversized sigs for years.
 
I know there are rules to this competition, but sometimes I feel like they are implemented a bit TOO harsh. I mean, yes Keane's signature doesn't meet the requirements, but is it really considered oversized? I'm not saying those rules should go all together, but I think there should be exceptions to every rule, like if a contestant made a signature that's too large only by a tad.
 
I guess it's kind of a "if 1 does it everyone will" thing but I wouldn't be against a slight 15 pixel increase or something. Anyway, I'm not sure why my sigs keep being larger than I save them as, but I've been real careful and this should be 250 pixels:
fls450J.png

have you ever seen so many feels on a single thread
 
I asked a while ago if anyone wanted a height increase in the limit but only 1 person answered that question seriously so I never did it. I was pondering asking it again earlier but since you guys brought up I shall : What do you guys think the new height limit should be?

On the additional note i'm so strict with the rules because if I were to accept all these sigs that are slightly over then is there really any point having the rule up in the first place? I would half get it if it's just the odd sig here and there but a lot of people seem to like submitting well over despite the constant reminder that it's over sized.

EDIT : As for the sig i'm not sure if you just linked the wrong one but it's still coming up with 274 px in height whenever I go to "View Image Info" on Firefox.
 
Serza5 said:
I asked a while ago if anyone wanted a height increase in the limit but only 1 person answered that question seriously so I never did it. I was pondering asking it again earlier but since you guys brought up I shall : What do you guys think the new height limit should be?
Sounds like RPC. But yeah, I'd be up for, I dunno, 285 - 300 pixels?

Serza5 said:
On the additional note i'm so strict with the rules because if I were to accept all these sigs that are slightly over then is there really any point having the rule up in the first place? I would half get it if it's just the odd sig here and there but a lot of people seem to like submitting well over despite the constant reminder that it's over sized.
Aye, that's what I figured.

Serza5 said:
EDIT : As for the sig i'm not sure if you just linked the wrong one but it's still coming up with 274 px in height whenever I go to "View Image Info" on Firefox.
RvGruVU.png

It's my resized image. ;_; I'll have another look.
 
300 is too much. 285 i'd be ok with but anymore is a no no.

EDIT : On similar note I want to take the time here to say that if i'm sounding too serious about this or just in general on this site I do apologise. I do not mean to make out that i'm being, for a lack of better terms, "ms strict britches" I just tend to be very to the point these days which means I may make myself out to sound like that even if it's far from the intention.
 
Back
Top