SOTM#170 - Rayman Legends
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Yeah Dart, enter that you already got my vote tbh
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?
Master wrote:
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87631
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640267
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Make it into a signature with valid dimensions and you'll get my vote.Dart wrote:They'd be too chaotic if we did as we please, like I could post this as a signiture:
-
PluMGMK

- Posts: 40508
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
- Contact:
- Tings: 136606
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
@Tomazo: Ah but if that was the theme then someone else might enter something even better!
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
All stereotypes considered, I would DEFINITELY win rather unfairly if that were the theme and if I entered.
Hm... I'm kind of debating entering right now... it's obviously not too late to go make some last minute tweaks if I decide on it, right?
Hm... I'm kind of debating entering right now... it's obviously not too late to go make some last minute tweaks if I decide on it, right?
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
You can try reading the minimum size now.Tunderous wrote:Alright, I changed it.Serza5 wrote:You can try reading the rules on the size limit is what you can do.
I completely forgot that this was the "Enter whatever image you want" contest instead of a "Enter a signature" contest.Shadowrayman wrote:Why do we have to make the signatures 285 x 750 px can't we just leave the sig size how it is because why does it matter? Can't we just do what we want?Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.
As long as it's within the rules and before the deadline you can enter whatever, whenever you want. There's also no stopping you from editting your sig midway through submission if you wanted to add something else to it or fix something.nr0r wrote:All stereotypes considered, I would DEFINITELY win rather unfairly if that were the theme and if I entered.
Hm... I'm kind of debating entering right now... it's obviously not too late to go make some last minute tweaks if I decide on it, right?
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I don't know if you caught this before, Serza. I'll just put it here again just to be sure.
Master wrote:So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?Master wrote:
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Seems like everyone has so many ideas for this theme, so we can think of it as next SOTM theme already confirmed.PluMGMK wrote:@Tomazo: Ah but if that was the theme then someone else might enter something even better!
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I did, my mind blanked from doing too much shit at once, I got this though.Master wrote:I don't know if you caught this before, Serza. I'll just put it here again just to be sure.Master wrote:So I was going through some old stuff I made, and I found this. I should be able to submit this one again, right?Master wrote:
As for themes we do special ones quad monthly and March would be the time we have an official theme up. That said i'd need something more simple than "Hidden Satanist Meanings in Video Games" since overly specific themes like that are a disaster for turn outs, but if we could think of something related but on a broader spectrum we could go with that and you can submit those specific sigs in that.
-
Dart

- Posts: 4950
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:04 pm
- Location: The Realm Of Perpetual Sleepiness
- Tings: 49845
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Dart wrote:They'd be too chaotic if we did as we please, like I could post this as a signiture:
and probably win too...
nr0r wrote:That would honestly be a lovey signature and should be incorporated into one in the near future.
Tomazo wrote: SOTM #92: Hidden Satanist Meanings in Video Games
I will definitely vote for you Dart.
Tunderous wrote:same
It is done!Hunchman801 wrote:Make it into a signature with valid dimensions and you'll get my vote.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Wonderful! It looks as good as we all had hoped.
-
Tunderous

- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:34 am
- Location: In a galaxy... far far away...
- Contact:
- Tings: 930
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
wonderful
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87631
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640267
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Now we're talking!
-
#Rubber mark#

- Posts: 4999
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere dirty and stinky... Behind you!
- Tings: 83026
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
What's wrong with big signatures? Why is this forum so strict with everything?Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.
750 px:
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.#Rubber mark# wrote:What's wrong with big signatures? Why is this forum so strict with everything?Serza5 wrote:I was just about to until I noticed that it's above the width limit of 750 px.
750 px:
rubbersig-750.jpeg
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I think Rubber mark didn't mean it seriously, if you read back some pages here, you will surely understand.nr0r wrote:I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Simple misunderstanding and I'm not about to read up on a bunch of pages for nothing.Tomazo wrote:I think Rubber mark didn't mean it seriously, if you read back some pages here, you will surely understand.nr0r wrote:I don't think it's too much of a 'strict' thing, but more of a way of making it even and fair for contestants.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
The size limits are in place as a way to differentiate a "sig" from being just "a regular picture only there's a bit of text with your name on it". It's also a fine guideline on what would be considered too big for general forum viewing.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Hey yeah that makes sense.Serza5 wrote:The size limits are in place as a way to differentiate a "sig" from being just "a regular picture only there's a bit of text with your name on it". It's also a fine guideline on what would be considered too big for general forum viewing.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I just meant he was joking.nr0r wrote:Simple misunderstanding and I'm not about to read up on a bunch of pages for nothing.



