Actually... Yeah, at least if it is without any danger.Master said:On the topic of offspring, given how genetic modification is starting to gain traction. If you were to have offspring, would you have them modified in such a manner? And if so, what would be the limit? Would you simply make them resistant to disease and illness? Or if ethics allowed, try to improve on them?
I don't really understand how preserving your genetics is a value, I'd think your ability to raise children and the way you raise them would be much more of a value and much more of a factor for whether they'd grow up to be douchebagsincognito said:I'm pretty surprised that pretty much no one here is concerned about preserving the family's genetic patrimony. Is that so much of a forgotten value recently or is it just that you dudes here consider themselves so much as douchebags that they would be unable to withstand the company of their children ?
Don't get me wrong, I don't talk about the choice of of having a children or not, biological or not, I'm talking about the preference most members of this board seems to have towards adoption rather than biological legacy.Master said:Or perhaps we're more concerned with wellbeing, kids aren't cheap. I certainly don't want to start having offspring if they're just going to suffer because there's not enough income to support them.