It's a sad sight indeed, but terrorism? I know the definition can be as vague as the use of violence in the pursuit of political aims, but if this is terrorism, then so were the Minneapolis riots. The violence wasn't targeted at civilians, it was just a bunch of vandals breaking in and making fools of themselves. One was even shot right in the neck by the police, as inevitably happens during violent unrest.
As for Trump, he certainly didn't do anything to stop it, but he didn't instruct people to break in either. At best, he said that people should walk down the Capitol and protest.
Trump made a party while capitol was being attacked. He stated to have loved them. Yes he said to have loved the terrorists.
And this is called by ANYONE who knows law a bit as terrorism. The USA also has a section defining terrorism and this attack was aimed at a part of the constitution to undermine democracy and insight fear to the legislators.
I really hope your analogy was just an accidental miscatch. There is no debate about this around.
sedition, insurrection are the legal passages they will likely be held accountable for. Treason is defined slightly differently and thus not usable here.
If you didn't follow all, Trump has continued to spread lies and provoke people to act and not let them steal it.
He created a cult and even though there are 2 tweets that show he lost control over his cult, 3rd one said to love them.
I cannot stress this enough
*He said to love traitors, domestic terrorists with confederat flags, nazi flags etc.* after they attacked it. over a day later he had to make a statement. I don't think he wanted to say these words but whoever wrote it made it so the cult members don't stop. He still insisted something was very wrong in election (which there is no evidence of, and most of smaller (singular to less than a dozen) cases were republican favouring. His lawyers also conceded to have nothing on trials.
This man is insane and if you think it wasn't, a spokesman from trump administration mentioned trial by combat.
If you didn't follow the stories closely, you miss out on how insane this is. Police officers and some from military helped get these in and were fired when Identified..
We talk about the Capitol were congress confirms the election results. It was a direct attack against a democratic part.
idk what protests you refer to but a riot isn't terrorism by default. Political motivated too. As long as it isn't aimed at politicians, bodues representing the constitution or to induce fear among the whole population, it's not terrorism.
I think I forgot one more condition but Terrorism isn't something lightly. I watched the news live. I watched the crazy shit that went on. This was terrorism. There is no doubt about it.
If Treason wasn't defined as is, as every lawyer stated it's sedition not treason, it would have been treason too.
They got as far as into the congress floor. The woman shot was trying to go through a window that was smashed open and national guard pointed guns to that window. Despite the obvious warning of freaking leaving, she decided storming a building with politicians and ARMED PEOPLE next to her. Her death was anything but injustice. There is high evidence how this mob of domestic terrorists received less force because of some in police taking part and under staffed guards. There is also a reason why they had not enough. Which gets rather crazy. FBI and such have been confirmed to offer help and other agencies but police refused help. Slowing aid significantly.
And in the end 5 people have been confirmed dead.
one from police/national guard (died from injuries later on)
1 shot dead while committing one of the highest offenses possible in USA (the fact it's only 1 is insane, we talk about a direct attack on a constitutional body)
3 died through different means
I think 1 was falling down from a structure, 1 died through material of a flashbang getting into blood flow (flashbang must have been really close)
1 died by tasing himself
I can confirm the first 2 I mentioned, the last 3 are just what goes around how they died.
edit:
here is a breakdown of a lot of what happened. After he made this video some more disgusting things, like the video of Trump having a good time with others, came about.
edit nr.2: to look up "18 U.S. Code § 2331 - Definitions"
Section 5
(B)appear to be intended—
(ii)
to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii)
to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
If the case you refer to with rioters in that place have very specific aims they could end up being declared terrorists under 5 B i
but if it was about BLM, which is an outrage based upon injustice, the motives don't add up to terrorism.
However, looters have often confirmed they just wanted to steal in chaos. Some don't some did.
And there were burning houses and such as most extrem stuff, but due to motives being very different these have their own sections and definitions