Rayman Raving Rabbids

Ratchet and Clank used to be 3+ only, but they went up to 7+. The Rayman series should do that too.
 
Going direct to 18+ is ridiculous for Rayman games. 7+ is a good rating. And why rate it 3+, there isn't even a kid under 7 that play's video games :P.
 
Okay, shall we petition for a dark, gothic 7+ Rayman game with cutscenes directed by Tim Burton then? :shock: :D :hinhinhin: AWESOME!
 
I think a dark genre for Rayman would fit his personality very well, as long as it still had a sense of humour! :mrgreen:

And why rate it 3+, there isn't even a kid under 7 that play's video games
I did... :|
 
acarr1 said:
Definetly. Being a 3+ has limited rayman's games far too much over the years.
Not really, I don't think. It targets a wider audience. I'll admit that it makes the game look kiddie, though.
 
I just realised something about the Bunnies can't fly downwards game...

The rings are totally modelled from Superman 64, or perhaps Starfox on the SNES!

AMIRITE? Cause we all know Superman 64 is like, the greatest videogame EVER! :fou:
 
I figured, but I can't really tell around here. I remember when RRR2 was announced, some one declared it a sin against humanity simply because they were reusing the original logo.
 
Every Rabbids game is a party game, so it doesn't matter if there are new logo's or not because the goal is always playing mini games. The Rabbid mini games are fun tough.
 
Joshua822 said:
Every Rabbids game is a party game, so it doesn't matter if there are new logo's or not because the goal is always playing mini games. The Rabbid mini games are fun tough.
I've never actually played Raving Rabbids. Ever. :P
 
Well good, you might hav to avoid RRR1, but definatly RRR2 and coming soon, TV party. :|
 
My boss at work is going to lend me rabbids 3 and her Wii Fit just so I can make a review on the horrid game.
 
Back
Top