THE PICTURE EHICH NEEDS TO BE REMOVED||StaceyW wrote:What picture?
Search for "portable power". My search doesn't work.

THE PICTURE EHICH NEEDS TO BE REMOVED||StaceyW wrote:What picture?




I'm supposed to take care of it, but I must finish Picture City and the Caves of Skops first.spiraldoor wrote:Look at this. Just look at it. It's a disgrace. Twenty-three screenshots of the final fight in the GBC version, zero of the real version. The detailed description of the final fight doesn't even mention the fact that it's of the GBC version. This is unacceptable. The GBC version of Mr Dark should have a paragraph, at most. Not this.





What's all that about Mister Dark transforming? That's just a theory as to why his face was used next to the health bar, not a fact.Hunchman1000 wrote:
Here is the rewritten article : Mr Dark. All it needs is some more screenshots from the original game.



If you have another theory supported by less insignificant and trivial facts, feel free to tell us about it.spiraldoor wrote:I don't think we should allow something as insignificant and trivial as the choice of icon on the health bar of a boss to affect our views of the game's canon in such a way.




I thought it was pretty clear for everyone that the very first boss in the game isn't Moksito, but it's already been discussed anyway.Holy Crap wrote:Space Mama and Moskito both appear twice?
This would have been more logical if there was the same animation too.Holy Crap wrote:My theory is that he just summons jumbled up creatures in the same way he summons Bad Rayman.
You're totally right, but you must keep in mind that everything is speculation as concerns the interpretation of a video game. For example, there is no proof that Mr Dark isn't Moskito in disguise and that his transformations (or summons, whatever) are not extraterrestrials who have decided to take over Rayman's world and reduce its inhabitants to cheesecake. It's not a question of truth, it's a question of likeliness, and we usually refer to the most believed theories. It's just that I see no argument supporting the summon theory, but if someone can find one and edit the article in consequence without screwing it, it's fine.Holy Crap wrote:The current article states speculation as though it were certain fact, which it isn't.

That's true, but those things are totally ridiculous, whereas the idea of him summoning creatures actually makes sense.Hunchman801 wrote:You're totally right, but you must keep in mind that everything is speculation as concerns the interpretation of a video game. For example, there is no proof that Mr Dark isn't Moskito in disguise and that his transformations (or summons, whatever) are not extraterrestrials who have decided to take over Rayman's world and reduce its inhabitants to cheesecake.Holy Crap wrote:The current article states speculation as though it were certain fact, which it isn't.

It was just an exemple to show that there are no certain facts.Holy Crap wrote:That's true, but those things are totally ridiculous, whereas the idea of him summoning creatures actually makes sense.
Actually, nothing should be stated as a certain fact. But I get your point, feel free to edit the article the way you like it.Holy Crap wrote:Anyway, even if the summoning theory isn't mentioned, I do at least think that the transformation theory shouldn't be stated as certain fact.


Perhaps, but if they wanted us to think that Mr Dark mixed the body parts of the previous bosses, it would have been more logical to show a mixing animation. I'm afraid there's absolutely no way to prove or disprove any of these interpretations.spiraldoor wrote:Also, if the developers wanted us to think that the hybrids were Mister Dark, I don't think that he would fly up and then appear from the right side of the screen like that. They would have shown some kind of transforming animation.
