New info from old R2 site?

For discussions about the Rayman series.
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Hunchman801
Bad Rayman
Posts: 87628
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
Tings: 640252

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Hunchman801 »

Something I find absolutely aberrant is that trend of systematically calling one's drawings art. It's so widespread now that almost everyone, including respectable people, tarnishes this word when referring to their artworks. It just sounds amazingly pretentious, especially once considered the problem of the definition of art.

That's why I usually avoid deviant act, as it makes it look like a place of common intellectual masturbation in which pseudo-elitist artist wannabes spend their time blowing each other :boon:
Raygirl
Teensy Wizard
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: right here right now
Contact:
Tings: 2490

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Raygirl »

Hunchman801 wrote:Something I find absolutely aberrant is that trend of systematically calling one's drawings art. It's so widespread now that almost everyone, including respectable people, tarnishes this word when referring to their artworks. It just sounds amazingly pretentious, especially once considered the problem of the definition of art.
Well art is purely subjective depending on the individual, but out of interest what would you define as 'art'?
Hunchman801
Bad Rayman
Posts: 87628
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
Tings: 640252

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Hunchman801 »

Raygirl wrote:Well art is purely subjective depending on the individual, but out of interest what would you define as 'art'?
My subjective point of view is not relevant to such considerations, but I think the definition at Wikipedia is really interesting:
Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
All I'm saying is that it should not be associated with every non-utilitarian creation ;)
Cairnie
Globox
Posts: 10163
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: robin hood land
Contact:
Tings: 90485

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Cairnie »

Phoenixan
Ursula
Posts: 1802
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 4:15 am
Contact:
Tings: 26333

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Phoenixan »

lol Or his "Artist's Breath"

Personally, the "Artist's Shit" is a lot funnier, I think.
Acarr
Electoon
Posts: 18436
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:49 am
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Tings: 0

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Acarr »

WWoah hands way up for me.
Raygirl
Teensy Wizard
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: right here right now
Contact:
Tings: 2490

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Raygirl »

Wait, that's a contradiction o_o
Hunchman801 wrote:
Raygirl wrote:Well art is purely subjective depending on the individual, but out of interest what would you define as 'art'?
My subjective point of view is not relevant to such considerations
and then you quote this:
Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
What 'appeals' to you may not appeal to me, hence art is subjective based on personal opinion. o0o

Hand up if you think this is art (on a similar theme to Stacey)

Image
Acarr
Electoon
Posts: 18436
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:49 am
Location: In a galaxy far far away
Tings: 0

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Acarr »

C'mon, an upside-down urinal is definetly art, no question about it. :P Seriously, some weird things have really got into galleries...
Hunchman801
Bad Rayman
Posts: 87628
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
Tings: 640252

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Hunchman801 »

Raygirl wrote:Wait, that's a contradiction o_o
Hunchman801 wrote:
Raygirl wrote:Well art is purely subjective depending on the individual, but out of interest what would you define as 'art'?
My subjective point of view is not relevant to such considerations
and then you quote this:
Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
What 'appeals' to you may not appeal to me, hence art is subjective based on personal opinion. o0o
True, but my personal point of view doesn't intervene in such a definition, as a result of my first statement :)
Raygirl
Teensy Wizard
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: right here right now
Contact:
Tings: 2490

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Raygirl »

Hunchman801 wrote:
Raygirl wrote:Wait, that's a contradiction o_o
Hunchman801 wrote:
Raygirl wrote:Well art is purely subjective depending on the individual, but out of interest what would you define as 'art'?
My subjective point of view is not relevant to such considerations
and then you quote this:
Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
What 'appeals' to you may not appeal to me, hence art is subjective based on personal opinion. o0o
True, but my personal point of view doesn't intervene in such a definition, as a result of my first statement :)
My question was to you was 'what do YOU define as art', not 'what does wiki define as art'. I'd just like to hear what you'd classify as art and what you wouldn't. :)
Haruka
Ly
Posts: 26748
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:19 pm
Contact:
Tings: 200115

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Haruka »

spiraldoor wrote:Hey look what I found.
:o Spiral, you do like to bring back my memories! I also remember to visit this website years ago!

By the way, I would also love to see again the mini sites about R1,R2, RM and R3. :D

And Raygirl, I didn't get offended. XD

And you know also that I ain't a rabbid fangirl. (Those people do annoy me, they behave like children... :mefiant: )
PluMGMK
Annetta Fish
Posts: 40508
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
Contact:
Tings: 136606

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by PluMGMK »

Haruka wrote:(Those people do annoy me, they behave like children... :mefiant: )
Most of them are children. :lol:
spiraldoor
Umber
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
Tings: 156600

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by spiraldoor »

Hunchman801 wrote:
Wikipedia wrote:Art is the process or product of deliberately arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions.
That definition is bullshit in m opinion, as it not only allows for absolutely anything to be classed as "art", and also implies that anything which does not "appeal to the senses or emotions" is not art. I believe that I know exactly what art is, but there really aren't any words in the English language to describe it.
PluMGMK wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:I can't access it, as I don't have Macromedia Flash or something.
No, the Web Archive couldn't access it, as it doesn't have Macromedia Flash or something. Ergo, no-one can access it. :(
I find it difficult to believe that a website which is designed to archive the entire internet, and which we have already seen displaying the Rayman 2 Flash site perfectly, would not have Macromedia Flash...
PluMGMK
Annetta Fish
Posts: 40508
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
Contact:
Tings: 136606

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by PluMGMK »

spiraldoor wrote:
PluMGMK wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:I can't access it, as I don't have Macromedia Flash or something.
No, the Web Archive couldn't access it, as it doesn't have Macromedia Flash or something. Ergo, no-one can access it. :(
I find it difficult to believe that a website which is designed to archive the entire internet, and which we have already seen displaying the Rayman 2 Flash site perfectly, would not have Macromedia Flash...
Oops. :oops: Sorry. Maybe the Flash Animation File wasn't archived then.

BTW, my old homepage is gone forever, because I never backed it up before I replaced it. However, the Web Archive doesn't have it either. :(
Raygirl
Teensy Wizard
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: right here right now
Contact:
Tings: 2490

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Raygirl »

Haruka wrote:And you know also that I ain't a rabbid fangirl. (Those people do annoy me, they behave like children... :mefiant: )
;D That's cool, I know you're not a rabid fangirl ^_^
spiraldoor
Umber
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
Tings: 156600

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by spiraldoor »

PluMGMK wrote:BTW, my old homepage is gone forever, because I never backed it up before I replaced it. However, the Web Archive doesn't have it either. :(
What homepage is that?
Cairnie
Globox
Posts: 10163
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:05 pm
Location: robin hood land
Contact:
Tings: 90485

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Cairnie »

Try googling it and see if it's been cached? You might be able to save some pics or HTML files there.

You should always, ALWAYS have a backup of a site somewhere in like a web design folder or something.
PluMGMK
Annetta Fish
Posts: 40508
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
Contact:
Tings: 136606

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by PluMGMK »

StaceyW wrote:You should always, ALWAYS have a backup of a site somewhere in like a web design folder or something.
I know that now, but I was, like, eight at the time.
Hunchman801
Bad Rayman
Posts: 87628
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
Location: Paris, France
Contact:
Tings: 640252

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Hunchman801 »

Raygirl wrote:My question was to you was 'what do YOU define as art', not 'what does wiki define as art'. I'd just like to hear what you'd classify as art and what you wouldn't. :)
I wouldn't have quoted Wikipedia if I actually knew how to define art myself :P
Raygirl
Teensy Wizard
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: right here right now
Contact:
Tings: 2490

Re: New info from old R2 site?

Post by Raygirl »

Hunchman801 wrote:
Raygirl wrote:My question was to you was 'what do YOU define as art', not 'what does wiki define as art'. I'd just like to hear what you'd classify as art and what you wouldn't. :)
I wouldn't have quoted Wikipedia if I actually knew how to define art myself :P
I also wasn't asking what the absolute definition of art was, I was asking what you define as 'art'. How about some suggestions of what you'd define as examples of 'high art'?
Post Reply