Jim Carrey pokemon? This is me trying to keep on topic.
General Pokémon Thread
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Same here. 
Jim Carrey pokemon? This is me trying to keep on topic.
Jim Carrey pokemon? This is me trying to keep on topic.
-
El Dango

- Posts: 12908
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:01 pm
- Location: Where you need me the most
- Contact:
- Tings: 107355
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Is that Jim Carrey in... a horror movie?Hunchman801 wrote:http://www.asdfplus.com/Gaceta/Especial ... number.jpg
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
By the way, I didn't get time before, but for comparison, there are:Holy Crap wrote:23.Serza5 wrote:Yeah it looks different but isn't there a lot of dark types already?
53 Psychics
33 Fires
80 Normals
25 Fightings
65 Flyings
50 Poisons
48 Grounds
37 Rocks
47 Bugs
18 Ghosts
26 Steels
19 Dragons
22 Ices
28 Electrics
55 Grasses
92 Waters
So no I think Dark does indeed need a boost to numbers, currently having the 4th leaset (and Ghost and Dragon SHOULD be rare anyway).
Re: General Pokémon Thread
I think that numbers are good but yes, Dark types could be raised up.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
*Note to self : I must research into this stuff before making a statement*
A ghost dragon? That would be quite interesting.
A ghost dragon? That would be quite interesting.
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
O rly?Serza5 wrote: A ghost dragon? That would be quite interesting.
*Note to self : I must research into this stuff before making a statement*
Bulbapedia is amazing.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
A new one I meant.
Ok thats not what I meant, I find it hard to remember every single pokemon there is, especially when i'm in school "revising" physics.
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Haha I understand, I personally have a near encyclopaedic knowledge of Pokemon but not everyone else does.
Giratina is pretty memorable though...
Giratina is pretty memorable though...
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
I know all of the 1st gen and most of the second gen. Other than that i'm pretty forgetful.
Yeah but it has an unusual type so it's easy to forget.
Yeah but it has an unusual type so it's easy to forget.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
I always wanted a dark and flying type bird.
Like Staraptor but with the possibility to do dark moves like dark void.
Like Staraptor but with the possibility to do dark moves like dark void.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
I would like that more Psychic+Dark types were created, or more Psychic+Fight types.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
I think a fire water type would be nice. 
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
We already have three. I'd personallyh prefe some brand new type combinations, like Bug/Electric and Fire/Dragon.Haruka wrote:more Psychic+Fight types.
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Or Dragon and Ice would be great. 
-
spiraldoor

- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
- Tings: 156600
Re: General Pokémon Thread
How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Yeah. it could be a water dragon. 
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Dragonite doesn't suck, it's actually quite poweful.spiraldoor wrote:How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
As for the second point, it's face is actually very similar to that of Dragonairs. Truly, I see no point to your suggestion.
We have enough of those... yes, two is enough.Serza5 wrote:Yeah. it could be a water dragon.
-
spiraldoor

- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
- Tings: 156600
Re: General Pokémon Thread
When I said that it sucked, I wasn't referring to its strength in battle. I was referring to its stupid character design. And its face may be similar to Dragonair's, but what about the rest of it?Holy Crap wrote:Dragonite doesn't suck, it's actually quite poweful.spiraldoor wrote:How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
As for the second point, it's face is actually very similar to that of Dragonairs. Truly, I see no point to your suggestion.
Dratini looks a little too small and cute, but that's fine because it's a first-stage Pokémon. Dragonair looks like a bigger, better, more elegant and more badass version of Dratini, which is pretty cool. Dragonite breaks this cycle by throwing out everything that made the Dragonair cool and replacing it with generic cartoon dragon-ness.
I suggest an alternative to Dragonite; one which looks like the bigger, stronger, more vicious/elegant/badass version of Dragonair that Dragonite should have been in the first place.
I'd have to agree. Water/Dragon is a rather uninspired combination, and so is Dragonite's Dragon/Flying. I'd rather an elternate Dragonair evolution remain a pure Dragon-type, just like its pre-evolutions.Holy Crap wrote:We have enough of those... yes, two is enough.Serza5 wrote:Yeah. it could be a water dragon.
-
Holy Crap

- Posts: 15930
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
- Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
- Contact:
- Tings: 80202
Re: General Pokémon Thread
Hm, in that case I simply disagree, I think Dragonite is actually pretty cool. Salamence on the other hand...
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: General Pokémon Thread
What are the water dragons? I seem to have forgotten and is currently to lazy to look it up.
I don't mind Salamence but Dragonite is defiantly better.
I don't mind Salamence but Dragonite is defiantly better.

