General Pokémon Thread

For everything not related to either Rayman or Pirate-Community.
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

Same here. :boon:

Jim Carrey pokemon? This is me trying to keep on topic.
El Dango
Holly Luya
Posts: 12908
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Where you need me the most
Contact:
Tings: 107355

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by El Dango »

Is that Jim Carrey in... a horror movie?
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

Holy Crap wrote:
Serza5 wrote:Yeah it looks different but isn't there a lot of dark types already?
23.
By the way, I didn't get time before, but for comparison, there are:
53 Psychics
33 Fires
80 Normals
25 Fightings
65 Flyings
50 Poisons
48 Grounds
37 Rocks
47 Bugs
18 Ghosts
26 Steels
19 Dragons
22 Ices
28 Electrics
55 Grasses
92 Waters

So no I think Dark does indeed need a boost to numbers, currently having the 4th leaset (and Ghost and Dragon SHOULD be rare anyway).
Haruka
Ly
Posts: 26749
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:19 pm
Contact:
Tings: 200120

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Haruka »

I think that numbers are good but yes, Dark types could be raised up.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

*Note to self : I must research into this stuff before making a statement*

A ghost dragon? That would be quite interesting. :)
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

Serza5 wrote: A ghost dragon? That would be quite interesting. :)
O rly?
*Note to self : I must research into this stuff before making a statement*
:P

Bulbapedia is amazing. :mryellow:
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

A new one I meant. :P Ok thats not what I meant, I find it hard to remember every single pokemon there is, especially when i'm in school "revising" physics.
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

Haha I understand, I personally have a near encyclopaedic knowledge of Pokemon but not everyone else does.

Giratina is pretty memorable though...
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

I know all of the 1st gen and most of the second gen. Other than that i'm pretty forgetful.

Yeah but it has an unusual type so it's easy to forget.
Rsandee
Spyglass Pirate
Posts: 7778
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:42 pm
Location: The poolrooms
Tings: 91410

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Rsandee »

I always wanted a dark and flying type bird.
Like Staraptor but with the possibility to do dark moves like dark void.
Haruka
Ly
Posts: 26749
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:19 pm
Contact:
Tings: 200120

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Haruka »

I would like that more Psychic+Dark types were created, or more Psychic+Fight types.
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

I think a fire water type would be nice. :mryellow:
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

Haruka wrote:more Psychic+Fight types.
We already have three. I'd personallyh prefe some brand new type combinations, like Bug/Electric and Fire/Dragon.
Haruka
Ly
Posts: 26749
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:19 pm
Contact:
Tings: 200120

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Haruka »

Or Dragon and Ice would be great. :hinhinhin:
spiraldoor
Umber
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
Tings: 156600

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by spiraldoor »

How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

Yeah. it could be a water dragon. :mryellow:
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

spiraldoor wrote:How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
Dragonite doesn't suck, it's actually quite poweful.
As for the second point, it's face is actually very similar to that of Dragonairs. Truly, I see no point to your suggestion.
Serza5 wrote:Yeah. it could be a water dragon. :mryellow:
We have enough of those... yes, two is enough.
spiraldoor
Umber
Posts: 12392
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:13 pm
Tings: 156600

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by spiraldoor »

Holy Crap wrote:
spiraldoor wrote:How about an alternate Dragonair evolution that doesn't suck, and actually looks like it's from the same evolutionary line as Dratini and Dragonair?
Dragonite doesn't suck, it's actually quite poweful.
As for the second point, it's face is actually very similar to that of Dragonairs. Truly, I see no point to your suggestion.
When I said that it sucked, I wasn't referring to its strength in battle. I was referring to its stupid character design. And its face may be similar to Dragonair's, but what about the rest of it?

ImageImageImage
Dratini looks a little too small and cute, but that's fine because it's a first-stage Pokémon. Dragonair looks like a bigger, better, more elegant and more badass version of Dratini, which is pretty cool. Dragonite breaks this cycle by throwing out everything that made the Dragonair cool and replacing it with generic cartoon dragon-ness.

I suggest an alternative to Dragonite; one which looks like the bigger, stronger, more vicious/elegant/badass version of Dragonair that Dragonite should have been in the first place.
Holy Crap wrote:
Serza5 wrote:Yeah. it could be a water dragon. :mryellow:
We have enough of those... yes, two is enough.
I'd have to agree. Water/Dragon is a rather uninspired combination, and so is Dragonite's Dragon/Flying. I'd rather an elternate Dragonair evolution remain a pure Dragon-type, just like its pre-evolutions.
Holy Crap
General
Posts: 15930
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:54 am
Location: I AM OMNIPRESENT! (Just like God, only better, because I exist)
Contact:
Tings: 80202

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Holy Crap »

Hm, in that case I simply disagree, I think Dragonite is actually pretty cool. Salamence on the other hand...
Serza5
Mr Dark
Posts: 48387
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
Contact:
Tings: 490135

Re: General Pokémon Thread

Post by Serza5 »

What are the water dragons? I seem to have forgotten and is currently to lazy to look it up.

I don't mind Salamence but Dragonite is defiantly better.
Post Reply