Rayman Origins

Which version is your favourite?

  • PS3

    Votes: 31 15.2%
  • Xbox 360

    Votes: 33 16.2%
  • Wii

    Votes: 29 14.2%
  • PC

    Votes: 89 43.6%
  • PSVita

    Votes: 17 8.3%
  • 3DS

    Votes: 5 2.5%

  • Total voters
    204
iambored2006 said:
Haruka said:
Hunchman801 said:

My reaction right now is the same as Hunch.

And that is...?

About BG&E, thanks! I'm pretty sure I'll buy it now. I bought a new computer yesterday with Windows on it, so no more problems with compatibility for me!

Edit: Does anyone else have problems with the RO blog and website? They won't load to me.
Ha Ha Ha! REVENGE IS MINE!!!

Second Edit: I did some stuff I'm not proud of and made the website load, but the blog and the facebook page won't because of a problem in Ubi's website.
Those crafty people are no match for ME!!!


Oh well, they work fine for me :P
 
Found this picture in Google Images-
23268_pg015-france-entertainment-videogames-ubisoft-ancel-20110527.jpg


I don't know if it's a new or old picture, but it seems new to me.

Edit: Two things- First, this-
d263682d3ad5c6de1154f3ea501c48fd.jpg


I think it's a picture from somewhere in the Infernal Kitchen, I've never seen it, though.

In the same article I found an additional reason to make RO a retail game, which I've never heard before. The writer quotes Ancel as saying that the way the game was built did not fit a downloadable release. He says that the player will need to return to past worlds in order to collect everything in them with new powers, not unlike R1. This can't be executed in a downloadable title, because it means that you'd have to buy all the episodes. I've never heard this before, and it's very interesting. The NP issue states that the ability to swim and dive will be one of the powers unlocked in the end of the worlds, which means that there might be water in other worlds besides the ocean world and before it.
This is the article- http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/new-rayman-too-big-for-download
 
iambored2006 said:
Found this picture in Google Images-
23268_pg015-france-entertainment-videogames-ubisoft-ancel-20110527.jpg


I don't know if it's a new or old picture, but it seems new to me.

Edit: Two things- First, this-
d263682d3ad5c6de1154f3ea501c48fd.jpg


I think it's a picture from somewhere in the Infernal Kitchen, I've never seen it, though.

In the same article I found an additional reason to make RO a retail game, which I've never heard before. The writer quotes Ancel as saying that the way the game was built did not fit a downloadable release. He says that the player will need to return to past worlds in order to collect everything in them with new powers, not unlike R1. This can't be executed in a downloadable title, because it means that you'd have to buy all the episodes. I've never heard this before, and it's very interesting. The NP issue states that the ability to swim and dive will be one of the powers unlocked in the end of the worlds, which means that there might be water in other worlds besides the ocean world and before it.
This is the article- http://www.mcvuk.com/news/read/new-rayman-too-big-for-download

There's nothing new here to us actually. Initially Rayman Origins was going to be episodic, but I'm glad they dropped the idea. I do prefer retail games. *Likes to collect genuine CDs, manuals and boxes*
 
Haruka said:
Initially Rayman Origins was going to be episodic, but I'm glad they dropped the idea. I do prefer retail games. *Likes to collect genuine CDs, manuals and boxes*

Abso-bloody-exactly.
 
Rayman3DS said:
I know this is off-topic, but you guys should check this R3 review out:
Well, you didn't really have to go off topic here since we do have a Rayman 3 topic.
 
Oh so this is the game you wanna play is it Ubisoft? You make a blog in 2010, put up some posts, and seal the lid, then you post 'Still Working On The Game, More News In 2011.' in december, then you close the lid again, now did some more posts, and lock the lid shut. Well I say FU*& YOU UBISOFT. FU*& YOU!
 
beebo44 said:
Oh so this is the game you wanna play is it Ubisoft? You make a blog in 2010, put up some posts, and seal the lid, then you post 'Still Working On The Game, More News In 2011.' in december, then you close the lid again, now did some more posts, and lock the lid shut. Well I say FU*& YOU UBISOFT. FU*& YOU!

Hey, I have a VERY good reason to be angry! They literally tricked us with that post, and it was a dirty trick. You make it sound like I'm an idiot who's looking for someone to curse, well, I'm NOT ONE! I'm angry because of their last post, I really don't care for the lack of news. They make it sound like they're going to release footage of the game, and it created a huge hype. Weren't you mad when it was revealed as a test post?!
 
None want to hear your complains or what you think about Ubisoft or some stupid blog or whatever it is. That have nothing to do with the game itself. If something about Ubisoft annoys send them a mail with you moaning, that won't contribute to this thread in anyway.

Now we go back to the topic, shall we?
 
CheatCat said:
None want to hear your complains or what you think about Ubisoft or some stupid blog or whatever it is. That have nothing to do with the game itself. If something about Ubisoft annoys send them a mail with you moaning, that won't contribute to this thread in anyway.

Now we go back to the topic, shall we?

You can't say anything new which is more connected to the topic, and I really can't see how this is off topic. Besides, a lot of people here say things which are completely off topic and some of them are OK, it doesn't really matter if some posts don't contribute. I know I'm being exactly like spiraldoor when saying this, but your post contributes to the topic even less than mine.
 
I am offended by that comparison. Surely my posts don’t contain this much screaming and crying about trivial blog updates?
 
I don't wanna read anything about that damn blog entry any more. We tolerate a lot of messages that do not directly contribute to the topic, but any subject leading only to unjustified insults and sterile arguments is not welcome here.
 
Back
Top