I have nothing against the shooting genre as you must admit, it's quite immersive. The problem I have with some games though is that so many shooters lack originality. So many shooters literally copy other games in almost every aspect. Games like the Half-Life series and Far Cry/Crysis are examples of more modern original classics. They were built from the ground with their own ideas, not based off the ideas of another popular series. I was sad to see Crysis 2 become a completely generic city-bound FPS that so closely resembles CoD. Currently in the "popular shooters" genre there' two main rivals: CoD and Battlefield. CoD is pretty much the exact same game over and over again with a new campaign and new multiplayer maps, whereas Battlefield is actually a growing series. I think Battlefield is taking the shooting genre in the right direction, at least moreso than CoD. However, no matter how much better I think BF is than CoD I still think it lacks originality. Crysis 1/Crysis Warhead (they're the same story but Warhead follows a different character) was the last fresh and original shooter I've ever played. Unfortunately in order for Crytek to make more money they had to genericize Crysis 2. It's too sad to see the idea of conformity pull tighter and tighter on its draw string. Before we know it, even real life will have a desaturated, contrasted colour filter over it JUS LIEK IH WAS BACK IN WER WAR TUU.