Adsolution
Well-known member
- Tings
- 110,541
8/10 - while the aesthetical placement of things in your signature is basically perfect, I do think it seems far too oversaturated.
That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?Serza5 said:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.![]()
Why don't you go ask Acarr?Rayman3DS said:That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?Serza5 said:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.![]()
If she's anything like you, I probably wouldn't even bother.Serza5 said:I don't think the colour combo is bad it's more-so to do with the fact that the sig doesn't blend these colours in too well.
Why don't you go ask Acarr?Rayman3DS said:That's awesome, You're awesome. Are all scottish women this awesome?Serza5 said:Hm? Standing by your logic your sig is worth 2/10 then.![]()
She's a sexy Scottish lady much like myself.
Yeah, made it a long time ago. Probably should change it..Adsolution said:7/10 for Rayman3DS - I think the main problem is that the background is too dark.
Serza5 said:Nah it just has a black glow behind it.
4/10 for the following reasons :
- Text has ugly pixels floating around it
- Parappa is poorly rendered
- Plain blue background is plain (but I give it credit for not being an eye sore)
Serza5 said:Excess pixels isn't the problem with the render, it's more like they took out too many pixels to it looks like that he was poorly cut. That or you made it like that yourself since MS Paint (Even it's W7's ver) doesn't support transparency.