"To reduce time and work" can also be used as an excuse for someone not wanting to make an HD version at all: "The original is already nice, so it would be a waste to remake it."emshomar said:The bgm is in CD quality so it is already in a decent quality. I'd keep the tracks how they are to reduce time and work, but I am unsure what others opinion are.
THEdragon said:I heard Joe's voice for the first time a few minutes ago. I closed DOSbox pretty soon after that terrifying experience.
Oh my...emshomar said:THEdragon said:I heard Joe's voice for the first time a few minutes ago. I closed DOSbox pretty soon after that terrifying experience.Dropbox - Error - Simplify your life
www.dropbox.com
Have fun!
It actually is terrifying.emshomar said:THEdragon said:I heard Joe's voice for the first time a few minutes ago. I closed DOSbox pretty soon after that terrifying experience.Dropbox - Error - Simplify your life
www.dropbox.com
Have fun!
This is inductive reasoning, not deductive. One is a valid basis for an argument, the other is not. Your opinion has less to do with the skill of the one redoing the tracks and more to do with the apparent "required" failure in doing so. That's an irrational outlook on life.technology4617 said:
#1: I have no idea how that glitch passed play-testing. -_- But they also remixed the music in many areas, which was good sometimes (Clockwerk boss fight), but awful in others (everywhere else).Rayrobi said:1. I personally experienced that issue in Sly Cooper 1 HD, and that's nothing more than a programming glitch.
2. Jesus what the fuck, i didn't know the boss of Conker is a pile of shit.![]()
I don't know what's wrong with the latter two however. Though i guess i'll use those ideas in Rayman 1 HD, they actually seem cool.
I think the only thing that needs to be taken care of in the sound track is the songs looping over and over, rather than being extended so that won't happen. If the OST ends up being rerecorded, then there should at least be the option to use the originals.Rayrobi said:I'm not that dumb to put in a worse version of a song if the original was better, the problem is that today it is possible to make it far better. If the remastered version turns out to be worse, it obviously won't get into the game, you can be sure about that.I'm not like a person who is like: i have remastered something for a game, ppl say it is bad, nah i don't care, at least i make money out from it... ( cough* cough* Ubisoft cough*
)
![]()
OCG and Adsolution seem to be talking about rerecording.Rayrobi said:Why i actually thought of the original OST being in the game is because if we remake a song, there would sometimes be a big difference compared to the original, which people may like or not like, and i don't want them to do the latter. And that might be because i just started music making, so i don't have any experience in that at all.
Only rerecording and not remaking? Anyways, i don't want to use the original OST, above i stated the only reason why i actually thought of using it. I'm against it though, i'd go with remaking/rerecording the songs.technology4617 said:OCG and Adsolution seem to be talking about rerecording.Rayrobi said:Why i actually thought of the original OST being in the game is because if we remake a song, there would sometimes be a big difference compared to the original, which people may like or not like, and i don't want them to do the latter. And that might be because i just started music making, so i don't have any experience in that at all.
Both I guess.Rayrobi said:Only rerecording and not remaking?technology4617 said:OCG and Adsolution seem to be talking about rerecording.Rayrobi said:Why i actually thought of the original OST being in the game is because if we remake a song, there would sometimes be a big difference compared to the original, which people may like or not like, and i don't want them to do the latter. And that might be because i just started music making, so i don't have any experience in that at all.