Okay I'll make a bit of a longer post about this 'cause I want to tell you what I think, honestly.Bradandez said:STOP PUNCHING ME IN MY MAN VAGINA, SHROOB! YOU BIG MEANIE!
How many remakes does this game need to make people stop asking for one?PluMGMK said:Revolution seems good in some ways, but other ways are poorly thought-out.
This is why the game needs a proper remake!
That's the keyword.OldClassicGamer said:How many remakes does this game need to make people stop asking for one?PluMGMK said:Revolution seems good in some ways, but other ways are poorly thought-out.
This is why the game needs a proper remake!
No plsPuruun said:People ask for a Rayman 2 remake? o_o
Precisely what I meant.Rayrobi said:What would be a really good thing is to rethink and remake the game in a proper way. What that means is to bring back the good old stuff we all liked in the original games, but improve on the not-so-good aspects. Plus redesigning it in a way that doesn't change too much on the gameplay to make it seem a completele different game, but still enough to make it a worthy remake.
This is what Ubisoft doesn't have in mind when making a port/remake of a game ( with the exception of Rayman Revolution ).
Heck yeah, R3 HD suckedRayrobi said:Some sort of Rayman Trilogy should have happened instead of the million Rayman 2 ports and the awful Rayman 3 HD. :tssk: