- Messages
- 8,093
- Tings
- 5,782
Shrooblord said:Now it's a bit pretentious in that the writer even takes the time to write out the full word that 'DNA' encapsulates in the acronym, maybe just to show us how smart he feels or maybe just because of habit, but the point that is made is that our eyes could be able to see up to more than 220 FPS, exactly because are eyes don't see the world in frames, but more like a continual stream of visual information (which makes sense if you have a bit of knowledge on how the eyes work with the cones and the rods and the nerves and what have you) that only gets interupted by blinking.
This.
< thinks that because < is used to watching 30 FPS videos on YT, < is becoming narrow-minded about FPS and simply said bullshit about that.