sonicbrawler182 wrote:(highly hypocritical coming from you, I might add, especially since you do it in "on-topic" topics even to this day)
My how little effort you put into coming up with good citations. You literally never do it when they're needed most.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:Making damn sure everyone sees it instead of taking it to PM, and locking perfectly innocent topics in the process (while knowing you could have locked said topic).
I'm not here to get into another discussion with you on how you believe forums should be unconditionally moderated.
Additionally, the fact that you thought I created the thread clearly demonstrates what's probably an extreme bias you have against me, because not only were you wrong, you were so confident in yourself that you didn't even bother to check your sources. How hypocritical, if I may say so.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:And now you're doing a similar thing again. Accusing people of being thieving sociopaths when all they were doing is trying to help out two people
If you're that adamant you were literally Jesus, I suppose it would be the latter then:
Adsolution wrote:Short and simple: either your motive wasn't remotely pure and you have Fifo-grade swindling skills, or your motive was actually pure and you have Fifo-grade social skills.
Bear in mind you only explained yourself days afterward for some reason. In light of 95% of your arguments however, it's obvious you still don't understand that you took what wasn't yours and essentially sold it. It wasn't your property, you took it upon yourself to do what you apparently thought was better for everyone, even when it interferes with others. That's what religious extremists do when they keep trying to 'save' you - that isn't acceptable, nor is it respectful in the slightest - you made Brad wait an extra day before he could play the demo, and you didn't even ask him. Instead of screwing with his property, you could have, per se, let your friend wait until the demo went public. That's probably what he would have been expecting initially, unless you set him up for an unrealistic expectation that involves you stealing someone else's code. No matter how you put it, you took Brad's code without his permission, and that isn't okay. This is why I accuse you of being a sociopathic thief, because first of all, you're thieving, and secondly, you don't seem to understand why this is blatantly wrong.
sonicbrawler182 wrote:@technology: You would not make a very good judge at all. Stop thinking in absolutes. Context means everything, as do details.
Well no, he's right. No amount of excuses can change what you factually did, so him crossing out almost all of your post that was trying to justify something unjustifiable was actually perfectly logical.