Artificial Intelligence General Discussion

What are your feelings towards A.I.?

  • Mostly positive

    Votes: 5 13.2%

  • Mostly negative

    Votes: 13 34.2%

  • Mixed/Ambivalent

    Votes: 20 52.6%
  • Total voters
    38
Jesus!

I have my own terrible experiences with ai! I was so addicted to those damn chat bots for 2 years until i finally quit last October! So I’m never touching them again! Fuck that shit!
 
Yeah, i can see how they can be addictive..
Anyways, i’m a bit surprised nobody made a mention of that person who scraped the entire AO3.
 
Probably so that the AI can make fanfiction? Now i’m just thinking of some AI wasting resources on some omegaverse fic :pfff:
You can read all the details here.
 
I dunno why I said "possibly" :oops2: I'm not starting till next month anyway, still getting psyched up...
 
PluMGMK said:
Great time for me to be starting as a PhD student and hence possibly having to read undergrads' lab reports :fou:
Click to expand...

By the time you’re actually cheating, AI will probably be much better at replicating human writing as well. Just saying. :hap:
 
Rsandee said:
As a theoretical/computational chemist my understanding of AI is very limited, I only know basic methods of machine learning and neural networks in order to figure out accurate parameters related to forcefields and such. AI is a completely different beast, one that I thought we were seeing the first glimpses of when ChatGPT was released before Christmas. Having spent some hours toying with it, I can only assume how many heavy filters were placed and dogwhistles were programmed that will prevent anyone from getting interesting results. Sure, I asked it some questions like "What's the nth digit of pi?" or "Give me 10 statements while only one of them is a lie", all of which were responded back to incorrectly. Not to mention that the program also just blatantly makes up stuff when it can't answer your question.

I'm absolutely convinced this program can do a ton, but because we are in the very early stages of AI right now the developers don't know how to program it in a "controlled" way yet. It's being held back and most likely for good reason considering the malicious things one could do with such a powerful tool; it's basically Tony Stark's AI Jarvis. I'm also convinced it will take uhhhh.... about 30 years maybe until we will see an AI with properties actually approaching some kind of sentience similar to humans?

Maybe more than 30 years but if I were a betting man I wouldn't say any earlier than that, even when taking the quadratic growth of such technology into account.
Click to expand...

You’re right that ChatGPT isn’t “intelligent” in a human sense but it’s basically a giant statistical engine predicting the next word. The mistakes we saw aren’t because of filters but because it has no built-in math/logic engine, and filters mostly just stop unsafe outputs.

What’s often overlooked is the energy side: training one large model can use megawatt-years of electricity, comparable to running a small town. Even inference (just answering questions) at global scale eats huge amounts of power. So the bottleneck isn’t just “when do we reach sentience,” but whether scaling laws + energy demands make it sustainable.
 
Curionone said:
Rsandee said:
As a theoretical/computational chemist my understanding of AI is very limited, I only know basic methods of machine learning and neural networks in order to figure out accurate parameters related to forcefields and such. AI is a completely different beast, one that I thought we were seeing the first glimpses of when ChatGPT was released before Christmas. Having spent some hours toying with it, I can only assume how many heavy filters were placed and dogwhistles were programmed that will prevent anyone from getting interesting results. Sure, I asked it some questions like "What's the nth digit of pi?" or "Give me 10 statements while only one of them is a lie", all of which were responded back to incorrectly. Not to mention that the program also just blatantly makes up stuff when it can't answer your question.

I'm absolutely convinced this program can do a ton, but because we are in the very early stages of AI right now the developers don't know how to program it in a "controlled" way yet. It's being held back and most likely for good reason considering the malicious things one could do with such a powerful tool; it's basically Tony Stark's AI Jarvis. I'm also convinced it will take uhhhh.... about 30 years maybe until we will see an AI with properties actually approaching some kind of sentience similar to humans?

Maybe more than 30 years but if I were a betting man I wouldn't say any earlier than that, even when taking the quadratic growth of such technology into account.
Click to expand...

You’re right that ChatGPT isn’t “intelligent” in a human sense but it’s basically a giant statistical engine predicting the next word. The mistakes we saw aren’t because of filters but because it has no built-in math/logic engine, and filters mostly just stop unsafe outputs.

What’s often overlooked is the energy side: training one large model can use megawatt-years of electricity, comparable to running a small town. Even inference (just answering questions) at global scale eats huge amounts of power. So the bottleneck isn’t just “when do we reach sentience,” but whether scaling laws + energy demands make it sustainable.
Click to expand...

Well we could always just employ thousands of people who manually answer to your prompts and I'm sure that will make it sustainable ;)
 
PluMGMK said:
I dunno why I said "possibly" :oops2: I'm not starting till next month anyway, still getting psyched up...
Click to expand...
I guess I was right to say "possibly" after all, since it looks like all I'm correcting this semester is handwritten Quantum Mechanics homework. It is scanned and submitted online mind you, so I guess they could in theory try to deepfake it :mefiant:
 
Using Artificial Intelligence https://justdone.com/ai-humanizer for students can be a game-changer. AI tools can personalize learning, adapt to individual strengths and weaknesses, and provide instant feedback. They make studying more efficient and can help with organizing tasks or understanding complex topics. However, it’s important to balance AI use with critical thinking and human guidance to avoid over-reliance. Overall, AI offers exciting opportunities to enhance education and make learning more engaging.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top