Unpopular opinions on Rayman

Those people ain't the sharpest tools in the shed though. ;)
 
Mine:

I prefer Rayman 3 over 2.

I hate the Nymph designs from Rayman Origins and they ruined Betilla visually in my opinion.
 
Mine:

I prefer Rayman 3 over 2.

I hate the Nymph designs from Rayman Origins and they ruined Betilla visually in my opinion.
The first one actually isn't unpopular at all: many people think that 3 is better than 2. Now, what would be one that is unpopular and what my opinion is is that Rayman 2 is better than Rayman 3.
 
Mine:

I prefer Rayman 3 over 2.

I hate the Nymph designs from Rayman Origins and they ruined Betilla visually in my opinion.
The first one actually isn't unpopular at all: many people think that 3 is better than 2. Now, what would be one that is unpopular and what my opinion is is that Rayman 2 is better than Rayman 3.

unpopular would be : the ps1 version is the best and dreamcast the worst (Both are amazing)
 
Another one would be Tily is better than Ly. (completely untrue) :lol:
 
I think the goal is not to make up absolute rubbish that makes no sense, but to voice opinions that may be unpopular / in the minority, but still make some sense behind them (you can provide a line of reasoning). ;)
 
I know, but I just thought I'd try it once to show an example of what an unpopular opinion is, it would ruin the thread if everyone was doing it. ;)

Origins is my favourite Rayman game. I'm not sure if that's unpopular or not, but that one is true. Maybe they need to be more like having a favourite character that most people don't like.
 
Mine:

I prefer Rayman 3 over 2.

I hate the Nymph designs from Rayman Origins and they ruined Betilla visually in my opinion.
The first one actually isn't unpopular at all: many people think that 3 is better than 2. Now, what would be one that is unpopular and what my opinion is is that Rayman 2 is better than Rayman 3.
Actually Rayman 2 is a favourite of many. Neither of these is unpopular.
 
Rayman Legends isn't all that great. I think it has little to no appeal whatsoever. I also think Rayman 2's PS1 final boss is way better than the other versions.
 
It's an "opinion", not a "fact". Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. If what you said was the case, then I'd have to argue about the "fact" that the Ubiart games are amazing.

You don't think they are amazing like I do, so it's your "opinion" that they're not and mine that they are. At the end of the day, they're our personal opinions and there's no need to voice it repeatedly, especially when you've already made it clear on more than one occasion that you're not a Ubiart fan.

The thread is titled as "opinions" and not "facts", so it's best to keep it that way.

2 opinions would be that I prefer the Dreamcast version of Rayman 2, while Rayman fan2000 prefers the PS1 version. That's perfectly fine, they're opinions.
 
The skins of Rayman and Globox are not better than the originals?

I don't think I'm doing this right... :P
 
Origins > Legends, especially in art style

Murfy is one of the best characters

The series would have been even more interesting and appealing if all or most characters were kept limbless beyond the first game

Atari Jaguar version of Mr. Dark's Dare / Cloak of Darkness > main version, even if both are still great

Bandana Rayman > Hood Rayman
 
I agree with Origins are being nicer than Legends, but that's my personal preference.
 
I did hear stories that they couldn't get that to work properly then just replaced it because of time constraints, but I'm not sure if that's true.
 
Back
Top