SOTM#170 - Rayman Legends
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
I'm feeling agitated by that 
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Imco97 wrote:emotionless smile
-
Jewish Candy

- Posts: 7031
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
- Tings: 28664
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Unfortunately, I must disagree with Shroob. In speech and in person, we use intonation and body language extensively, and as the language moves further into the written sphere new methods to express pragmatic information are necessary. Smileys are one of those methods. Interpreting said information from plain text is a useful one indeed, but the colloquial is not dry and I see no reason why we should insist on reducing the potential for pragmatic expression.
I like this discussion on smileys.
I like this discussion on smileys.
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Yes but doesn't it get sad when you need smileys to interpret someone's post, or when you start seeing smileys that DO represent something as some contrived way of performing some sort of personal attack? Seriously, how can two characters conveying a smiling man indicate a passive-aggressive blow? The hell, man!
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Hmm, while I try to limit my emoticon usage, I do use them now and then, usually defensively if I say something that can be easily taken negatively.
-
Imco

- Posts: 9584
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
- Location: Somewhere only we know
- Contact:
- Tings: 123540
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Yeah, I for one seem to find plain text incapable of carrying emotions properly. I don't know, for example, whenever I see a "no." I always think of it as extremely rude. Just like "congratulations.", which for some reason I always interpret as a cynical statement.
Now, if those had been no
, no
, no
, no
, and congratulations
, congratulations
, congratulations
it'd have been easier to understand, although I must say these might not be the best examples.
Now, if those had been no
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
So when I make a typo or my phone doesn't auto-capitalise one time I'm being an aggressive cunt?
ok
ok
-
Imco

- Posts: 9584
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
- Location: Somewhere only we know
- Contact:
- Tings: 123540
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
In my book you are XD, although I'm also perfectly capable of telling my mind this is all bullshit. Which I do, way too often.Shrooblord wrote:So when I make a typo or my phone doesn't auto-capitalise one time I'm being an aggressive cunt?
ok
(ughh, I hate my brain sometimes)
I think this also has to do with the argument I had with BadGuy lately, about me not being able to correctly interpret his ironic remarks.
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Meh, I wouldn't really read much into such simple statements like that, if they're vague and ambiguous then they're vague and ambiguous, it's not very healthy to take things negatively all the time.
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Amen to that. Why not accept things at face values? If they later turn out to be negatives, so be it, sucks man. But if they never were yet you worried about them, you've gone and ruined your day worrying about nothing.
-
Imco

- Posts: 9584
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
- Location: Somewhere only we know
- Contact:
- Tings: 123540
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Like I said, tell that to my brain. I know perfectly well what you mean, but my first interpretation, which most of the time isn't a final interpretation, seems to be negative way too often.Shrooblord wrote:Amen to that. Why not accept things at face values? If they later turn out to be negatives, so be it, sucks man. But if they never were yet you worried about them, you've gone and ruined your day worrying about nothing.
-
Jewish Candy

- Posts: 7031
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
- Tings: 28664
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
It can be hard if you're wired that way, so it's all about training your brain to identify where and why it reacts like it does. Anxiety, eh, it's a total butt.
@Shroob, think about it this way; we can interpret most utterances from context, but sometimes we need a little extra information. Sometimes, yes, we need to roll our eyes or speak in a flat tone so that people understand we're being sarcastic etc. Smileys, things like /sarcasm, all ways of giving that information in text form. And, of course, some people need that extra info more than others.
@Shroob, think about it this way; we can interpret most utterances from context, but sometimes we need a little extra information. Sometimes, yes, we need to roll our eyes or speak in a flat tone so that people understand we're being sarcastic etc. Smileys, things like /sarcasm, all ways of giving that information in text form. And, of course, some people need that extra info more than others.
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Sure. Since I've started this conversation, I've come to realise I was overreacting a bit. It was just that I'm seeing less and less people being able to not use smileys in their sentences and it bugs me. I don't know why. Maybe I'm just antsy for no reason.
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Funnily enough, I remember another member getting a little irked over smiley usage. I ought to search about and see what I can find.
-
Imco

- Posts: 9584
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 3:16 pm
- Location: Somewhere only we know
- Contact:
- Tings: 123540
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
I just hope Serza won't forget to review my submission, lost somewhere in this conversation XD
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
All I know is, I haven't had an argument with anyone on this forum in recent memory, maybe pre-2011, but I honestly can't remember that far backImco97 wrote:the argument I had with BadGuy lately
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Oops, forgot to say thanks for the nice comments about my signature entry. Thanks y'all!
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Absolutely - it looks gorgeous. I wonder what the spikes are near the Elemesque character's chin are though. They look beard.
-
Jewish Candy

- Posts: 7031
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:13 pm
- Tings: 28664
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
That's his hair, Shrup. XD
Or perhaps a beak with a tongue sticking out. Can't unsee it
Did I comment on Imco's entry yet? It's a very nice one
Or perhaps a beak with a tongue sticking out. Can't unsee it
Did I comment on Imco's entry yet? It's a very nice one
-
Shrooblord

- Posts: 15762
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 5:07 pm
- Location: The Buccaneer MK. II
- Tings: 68850
Re: SOTM #69 - Freestyle
Oh of course, the back of his hair! I'm a dolt.

