SOTM#170 - Rayman Legends
Forum rules
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
Please keep the forum rules and guidelines in mind when creating or replying to a topic.
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Perhaps a illustrative diagram might better catch attention and convey the point more clearly?
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
1. I looked at this topic on my phone and I do believe the re-size thing to be the case but one thing that stands out is that ShadowRayman's current sig looks particulary large on my phone most likely because it's square (In comparison the mock up sig I made looked to be the exact same size as the one i'm using right now). For reference : http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm76 ... -05-30.png http://s293.photobucket.com/user/RayRay ... 7.png.htmlAmbidextroid wrote: As far as I know on mobile all images are automatically shrunk to fit the screen width, so if anything wider sigs would probably be harder to see than squarer ones.
As for a square-ish size limit, I think adding more than one maximum size would be a bit confusing (especially seeing as how so many new members already get the current dimensions wrong) but something around 325 to 350 square would be good.
And about people getting the dimensions wrong, maybe that should be higher up on the rules list? Right now it looks like a block of text and the size limit rule, probably the most often broken one, is near the bottom at the end of a sentence. People would probably pay more attention if it was right at the top in big letters, or something like that.
2. Consequently i'm a bit more iffy on the square sig now, not to mention 325 still looks a bit big to me :
3.. The biggest offenders of those who break the size limit rules tend to be those who were told directly at one point only to completely forget about it next time. I do think you're right in saying it should be higher up anyway.
Possibly, i'll change the position of the rule and post the mock up I made earlier bellow it.Master wrote:Perhaps a illustrative diagram might better catch attention and convey the point more clearly?
-
Ambidextroid

- Posts: 12913
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:04 am
- Location: Jaffa Castle
- Tings: 665
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Come to think of it I think I've done that beforeSerza5 wrote:The biggest offenders of those who break the size limit rules tend to be those who were told directly at one point only to completely forget about it next time.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
All that aside we're going to start voting tomorrow so anyone who has sigs they want to make within the size limit better do so now. 
-
Hunchman801

- Posts: 87628
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
- Tings: 640252
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
The forum does indeed resize images automatically now, however the file size remains the same (client-side resizing), so it makes sense to maintain limits on signatures. The forum's layout does not extend indefinitely with screen size and I believe the maximum width before an image gets resized is around 900-950 px, so we could go for something like that.
Signature height is a much more important problem as it creates a lot of scrolling for other users, with square signatures being especially annoying on mobile as they don't get resized at all. I feel that 285 px may already be too much.
Signature height is a much more important problem as it creates a lot of scrolling for other users, with square signatures being especially annoying on mobile as they don't get resized at all. I feel that 285 px may already be too much.
-
#Rubber mark#

- Posts: 4999
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 8:35 pm
- Location: Somewhere dirty and stinky... Behind you!
- Tings: 83026
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I can only make good sigs by making the sig bigger, why is this forum so strict with everything?Hunchman801 wrote:I feel that 285 px may already be too much.
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
285 keep in mind was voted by the members here when they felt the height was too small at 250, therefore i'm less inclined to downsize that further.Hunchman801 wrote: I feel that 285 px may already be too much.
Consequently today is the end which means it's time to vote.
6 sigs means 3 votes maximum and no minimum.
Code: Select all
Shadowrayman : 0
Master : 0
dart : 0
CHRdutch : 0
Keane : 0
Ambidextroid : 0I mentioned it at the start but to repeat here again; next contest is going to be themed and I know some of you wanted a particular theme so when voting be sure to suggest it, or another theme you think you'd like.
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Why isn't Rubber in? He resized his signature.
-
PluMGMK

- Posts: 40508
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
- Contact:
- Tings: 136606
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Voting Master, Keane and Ambidextroid.
-
Ambidextroid

- Posts: 12913
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:04 am
- Location: Jaffa Castle
- Tings: 665
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I vote Keane and Master
And for the theme of next contest, I suggest... videogame logos
And for the theme of next contest, I suggest... videogame logos
-
Serza5

- Posts: 48387
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 7:51 pm
- Location: MOTHER FUCKING SCOTLAND OH YEAH BABY
- Contact:
- Tings: 490135
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
You are indeed correct with this- I must've missed the post where he posted it and I apologise in advance.Harpic fraîcheur wrote:Why isn't Rubber in? He resized his signature.
I'll have to ask you two above to re-vote again- or rather just say if you stick to the votes you have,Serza5 wrote: 6 sigs means 3 votes maximum and no minimum.Last day of voting will be 27th which means results on the 28th.Code: Select all
Shadowrayman : 0 Master : 0 dart : 0 CHRdutch : 0 Keane : 0 Ambidextroid : 0 #Rubber Mark# : 0
I mentioned it at the start but to repeat here again; next contest is going to be themed and I know some of you wanted a particular theme so when voting be sure to suggest it, or another theme you think you'd like.
Suggested themes :
- Video game logos
-
PluMGMK

- Posts: 40508
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:00 pm
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cErgMJSgpv0
- Contact:
- Tings: 136606
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Going with the same vote again!
But I'd like to suggest Geometry as a theme, if that makes sense.
But I'd like to suggest Geometry as a theme, if that makes sense.
-
Ambidextroid

- Posts: 12913
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:04 am
- Location: Jaffa Castle
- Tings: 665
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I'll keep my vote too
-
Harpic fraîcheur

- Posts: 26130
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:57 pm
- Location: Au pays des prouts
- Tings: 375180
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I'll vote for #Rubber mark#.
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I'll vote for #Rubber mark#
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I also vote for #Rubber Mark#.
Last edited by jurebj on Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
NyaNyaLily

- Posts: 5059
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 5:53 pm
- Tings: 25298
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
I vote for Keane and Ambi
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Let's go Dart, Keane and Ambi!
-
Shadowrayman

- Posts: 310
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:33 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
- Tings: 5288
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Why does nobody vote for me?
-
Master

- Posts: 53542
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:14 am
- Location: Somewhere specific, I'd assume.
- Tings: 468310
Re: SOTM #91 - Freestyle
Because you're up against experienced and good competition, it's nothing to be taken personally. There's no vendetta against you here.


