Talk:Razorbeard: Difference between revisions
Replaced content with 'NO' |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
NO | NO | ||
==Lums== | |||
In Rayman 2, Razorbeard eats a Yellow/Red Lum. In Rayman 3 for the GBA he tries eating a Black Lum to 'gain its power'. Do you think maybe eating Lums gives him different powers, like the Yellow Lums would make him smarter, Red Lums would make him more resillient etc? [[User:Iheckler9|Iheckler9]] 15:41, 8 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Inspiration for the character == | |||
There are no direct evidences but I highly believe that Razorbeard was inspired in Napoleon Bonaparte. They share many things in common, including the height-factor (I also believe Napoleon was sensitive about his height). Could it be written the possibility of the character being inspired in that identity? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 20:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Main Char Image == | |||
Might seem nitpicky, but should we replace the main image with one that features the design featured in most of the versions? As it stands, the image we're using is of N64 Razor, with the hammer and spanner insteads of the crossed swords. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 18:26, 31 May 2014 (CEST) | |||
:Never noticed that, might be worth using the main one in the template and including the N64 one somewhere else in the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 00:50, 1 June 2014 (CEST) | |||
== Rayman Kart is his last physical appearance == | |||
Wouldn't this be considered trivia? like a fun fact sort of deal? | |||
Not angry about my edit being reverted just genuinely curious. it doesn't seem like very relevant information. --[[User:Archvile|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png|32px]] 21:24, 16 June 2025 (ADT) | |||
:Hi! If it's not so relevant, then maybe we can simply remove that line? I have no problems with that. Overgrown trivia sections are often a sign of poorly structured articles, as most of that information could often be more naturally integrated into the relevant sections of the article. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 10:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC) | |||
::I'd be okay with removing it. Because it really isn't more than a Fun Factoid the writer put in and from the perspective of a reader I found it a little jarring. My first thought was to move it to the Trivia section as to not omit it, but if you're willing to prune it. I encourage it. --[[User:Archvile|Archvile]] [[User_talk:Archvile|(talk)]][[File:mask1.png|32px]] 4:54, June 19 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Sure, I just removed it.—[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 16:19, 20 June 2025 (UTC) | |||