Talk:Fish (Eat at Joe's): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Spiraldoor (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I don't get what you're trying to say. Are you suggesting that those fish are members of Rayman's species? The three types of fish all have a different facial feature exaggerated, but all of them are still fish. There is no evidence to suggest that the ones with the large noses are anything more. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 14:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | :I don't get what you're trying to say. Are you suggesting that those fish are members of Rayman's species? The three types of fish all have a different facial feature exaggerated, but all of them are still fish. There is no evidence to suggest that the ones with the large noses are anything more. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 14:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Hair like Rayman, nose like Rayman, eyes look slightly like Rayman's...I think it's safe to say that it could be a Raymanian. | ::Hair like Rayman, nose like Rayman, eyes look slightly like Rayman's...I think it's safe to say that it could be a Raymanian. | ||
:::Apart from the fact that they're obviously fish, that is. If they are 'Raymanian', as you call them, then where are their bodies and their hands and their feet? What you call their 'hair' is clearly their fins, and almost every creature in the game (as well as many inanimate objects) have eyes that are 'slightly like Rayman's'. These fishes' noses are also substantially larger than those of Rayman, Tarayzan or any other member of their species – and in light of this, you do you explain the oversized eyes and mouths of the other two varieties of fish? You'd have a much easier time convincing me that Hunters or Livingstones are members of Rayman's species. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 20:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | |||