Template talk:Delete: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Sweet Jesus, the colours of this template!!! they burn!!!--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] 19:42, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | :Sweet Jesus, the colours of this template!!! they burn!!!--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] 19:42, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
:Most times we see a really bad article it gets deleted without question, so is this really necessary? Not to mention it doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Cairnie|Cairnie]] 20:13, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | :Most times we see a really bad article it gets deleted without question, so is this really necessary? Not to mention it doesn't make much sense. --[[User:Cairnie|Cairnie]] 20:13, 14 June 2012 (CEST) | ||
::Hmm, while I appreciate the intention behind this template, I don't think RayWiki is big enough to need this sort of template, I'm for deleting it. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 01:11, 29 May 2014 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:11, 28 May 2014
My eyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees! --
Haruka 15:44, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
Who on earth is this 'Epicrayman' guy, and why is he making weird templates? —Spiraldoor 
18:02, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
- Not only the colours are too much bright, aswell I find this template unecessary. --
Haruka 19:07, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
- Sweet Jesus, the colours of this template!!! they burn!!!--Sergiomonty 19:42, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
- Most times we see a really bad article it gets deleted without question, so is this really necessary? Not to mention it doesn't make much sense. --Cairnie 20:13, 14 June 2012 (CEST)
- Hmm, while I appreciate the intention behind this template, I don't think RayWiki is big enough to need this sort of template, I'm for deleting it. --
01:11, 29 May 2014 (CEST)
- Hmm, while I appreciate the intention behind this template, I don't think RayWiki is big enough to need this sort of template, I'm for deleting it. --