Template talk:Rayman series: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Spiraldoor (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
::::::::I just have a suggestion. Games like Rayman Gold and others for example aren't exactly remakes and/or ports. I would classify them as re-releases. Would you mind if I added the word? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:19, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | ::::::::I just have a suggestion. Games like Rayman Gold and others for example aren't exactly remakes and/or ports. I would classify them as re-releases. Would you mind if I added the word? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 01:19, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
:::::::::I see what you mean, though perhaps we should add another group for re-releases, as opposed to adding it into the (already quite long) heading?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 01:38, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | :::::::::I see what you mean, though perhaps we should add another group for re-releases, as opposed to adding it into the (already quite long) heading?--[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 01:38, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
::::::::::I would oppose splitting remakes and re-releases, since there's no clear line between the two. Many remakes are also ports. It's just too complicated. Extending it to something as long as "Remakes/ports/re-releases" isn't really an option. Maybe we could rename the subgroup something like "Variations", "Derivatives" or "Later releases" (though none of those are quite right)? —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 02:03, 16 April 2014 (CEST) | |||