Template talk:JibberishJungle: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

::Suffice to say, we wouldn't. It's obviously not as aesthetically pleasing, however, between aesthetics and functionality, I personally think functionality is of greater importance. There's no point having a prettied-up navbox if it can't effectively perform the task intended. And therein lies my issue with templates like these, they look pretty, but they're not the most functional. The same could also be said of the all-encompassing navboxes I made for R1 and R2, they're too bloated. They're an issue I want to refine further, and fine a more optimal solution to, but I don't feel I can deal with them at present. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png|150px|link=User:Master]] 20:31, 26 December 2014 (CET)

:::This is true, the functionality is more important than aesthetic. We may also use one of the images to represent the model you want to create (If that's possible). [[File:HarpicSign.png|150px||link=User:Harpic fraîcheur]] [[File:Harpic(LogoOfArmyPirateForMyProfile).png|45px||link=User:Harpic fraîcheur]] 21:00, 26 December 2014 (CET)

Revision as of 19:31, 26 December 2014 view source Master (talk \| contribs) 2,540 edits →Redesign? ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:00, 26 December 2014 view source Harpic fraîcheur (talk \| contribs) 4,978 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::Suffice to say, we wouldn't. It's obviously not as aesthetically pleasing, however, between aesthetics and functionality, I personally think functionality is of greater importance. There's no point having a prettied-up navbox if it can't effectively perform the task intended. And therein lies my issue with templates like these, they look pretty, but they're not the most functional. The same could also be said of the all-encompassing navboxes I made for R1 and R2, they're too bloated. They're an issue I want to refine further, and fine a more optimal solution to, but I don't feel I can deal with them at present. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 20:31, 26 December 2014 (CET)		::Suffice to say, we wouldn't. It's obviously not as aesthetically pleasing, however, between aesthetics and functionality, I personally think functionality is of greater importance. There's no point having a prettied-up navbox if it can't effectively perform the task intended. And therein lies my issue with templates like these, they look pretty, but they're not the most functional. The same could also be said of the all-encompassing navboxes I made for R1 and R2, they're too bloated. They're an issue I want to refine further, and fine a more optimal solution to, but I don't feel I can deal with them at present. --[[File:Sig5 2TEST.png\|150px\|link=User:Master]] 20:31, 26 December 2014 (CET)

			:::This is true, the functionality is more important than aesthetic. We may also use one of the images to represent the model you want to create (If that's possible). [[File:HarpicSign.png\|150px\|\|link=User:Harpic fraîcheur]] [[File:Harpic(LogoOfArmyPirateForMyProfile).png\|45px\|\|link=User:Harpic fraîcheur]] 21:00, 26 December 2014 (CET)