Talk:Jacquouille: Difference between revisions
RayGamer99 (talk | contribs) |
Hunchman801 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::::::::So, according to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zisQWDnI-gg this footage], it appears that ''[[Rayman Legends Retold]]'' has definitively decided to call these guys "Livingstones" rather than "Jacquouilles," just as Polokus intended! Not sure if this means that this page will get merged back into the main [[Livingstone]] article or not (I, for one, would hope so; if so, we could still make a note of their internal name on the Legends section of the main page), but it feels good that they went with that name. Despite my best efforts, I never did get used to calling the bandit Livingstones that internal name, so it's nice to know that I won't have to do that anymore! --[[User:RayGamer99|RayGamer99]] ([[User talk:RayGamer99|talk]]) 00:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC) | ::::::::So, according to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zisQWDnI-gg this footage], it appears that ''[[Rayman Legends Retold]]'' has definitively decided to call these guys "Livingstones" rather than "Jacquouilles," just as Polokus intended! Not sure if this means that this page will get merged back into the main [[Livingstone]] article or not (I, for one, would hope so; if so, we could still make a note of their internal name on the Legends section of the main page), but it feels good that they went with that name. Despite my best efforts, I never did get used to calling the bandit Livingstones that internal name, so it's nice to know that I won't have to do that anymore! --[[User:RayGamer99|RayGamer99]] ([[User talk:RayGamer99|talk]]) 00:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::Well, everyone seemed to hesitate and we never really came to a decision on this one. What isn't new is that "Jacquouilles" are a variation of Lividstones, and the words Lividstone and Livingstone now seem to be used interchangeably. I think the two questions that we want to ask ourselves are: | |||
:::::::::1. Does this variation of Lividstones warrant its own article, or should it be included in the main one? | |||
:::::::::2. If a separate article is needed, what to call it? | |||
:::::::::In order to gets things moving, maybe we could hold a vote on the first one? —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|class=sprite|link=User:Hunchman801]] 14:16, 10 June 2026 (UTC) | |||