Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization: Difference between revisions
Spiraldoor (talk | contribs) m moved Talk:Anti RaymanZone Organization to Talk:Anti-RaymanZone Organization: This is the grammatically correct form of the name, but feel free to revert if the mistake is important in some way (I can't recall how the members themselves spelt |
LucasDaMan (talk | contribs) Adding a new update |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Not sure about this== | == Not sure about this == | ||
I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | I don't know how comfortable I feel about giving these guys an article all to themselves. Their connection to Rayman is tenuous, and I don't think they deserve the attention or publicity of their own permanent page. It would be better to just mention them in the RaymanZone article – there isn't even much to say about them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 18:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
: Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | : Well those red links were bothering me, and there's actually a lot more to say. Not that it's going to be one of our most important articles, but I'd rather have one about pretty much everything. Whether they deserve it is not relevant towards the creation of such an article anyway. In conclusion, I'll just say it's no harm keeping it. —[[User:Hunchman801|Hunchman801]] 14:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
==PC== | |||
== PC == | |||
Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | Are any ARZO or KRK guys on Pirate-Community? [[User:Iheckler9|Iheckler9]] 12:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:They're not active, but a couple of them have accounts here if I recall correctly. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | :They're not active, but a couple of them have accounts here if I recall correctly. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] 19:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged? | IMO, this isn't really needed. Does RaymanZone exist still or was it merged? | ||
:I haven't checked RZ in ages but it probably still exists. You might be new to the community but for old timers ARZO is a very important part of the history of the Rayman community and since we decided to include community-related stuff in RayWiki, I believe this article is to be kept. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 08:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC) | :I haven't checked RZ in ages but it probably still exists. You might be new to the community but for old timers ARZO is a very important part of the history of the Rayman community and since we decided to include community-related stuff in RayWiki, I believe this article is to be kept. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 08:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Update == | |||
Honestly, the Anti-RaymanZone Organization and the Kill RaymanZone Klan reformed as good and had a change of heart, and they changed for the better. Ever since 2026, they decided to behave like normal human beings and are happy that their bans are permanently reversed. -[[User:LucasDaMan|Lucas]] 3:56, July 13, 2026 (EST) | |||