Category talk:Aquatic creatures: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I can say that's a plausible argument. Why not? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 17:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | :I can say that's a plausible argument. Why not? --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 17:51, 18 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
:In the absence of any proof indicating the presence of a Black Lum, I don't think they should. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 14:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | :In the absence of any proof indicating the presence of a Black Lum, I don't think they should. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 14:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::That's also true but, now it makes me think: is it officaily said anywhere that Céloche is a creation of the Hoodlums? The same thing I ask for the watercrafts. | ::That's also true but, now it makes me think: is it officaily said anywhere that Céloche is a creation of the Hoodlums? The same thing I ask for the watercrafts. [[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 20:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)---- | ||
---- | |||