Talk:Nettle: Difference between revisions

::::::To me, stone men have the ability to regenerate after being defeated, while nettles are never actually defeated, that's why I would suggest ∞. It's just my point of view though, this is why I suggest a little poll between the four of us to decide on the matter. —[[File:RRRGBAIcon8.png|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon0.gif|link=User:Hunchman801]][[File:RRRGBAIcon1.png|link=User:Hunchman801]] 20:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

:::::::I don't really like the idea of distinguishing between the nettles' and the stone men's resistance systems in this way; I think they both fall under the 'temporarily defeatable but ultimately invincible' category. Both enemies can sustain an infinite number of hits, but both can be beaten for short periods of time. Therefore the nettles shouldn't be given a simple ∞ and the stone men shouldn't be given a simple 5; instead we should try to find a way to informatively convey their complex resistances, like the method I proposed earlier. It may be that the nettles are not really 'stunned', and that they are actually recoiling or hiding or healing themselves or something like that, but I that's a bit too theoretical a distinction to make for what should be a cut-and-dried numerical system. (I hope I am making my case adequately.) —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 20:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)