Talk:Grolem 13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Stan423321 (talk | contribs) LEM |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::From now on we should revert his 'contributions' rather than clogging up the talk pages by responding to them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 13:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | :::From now on we should revert his 'contributions' rather than clogging up the talk pages by responding to them. —[[User:Spiraldoor|Spiraldoor]] [[File:IconSpiralDoor.png|link=User:Spiraldoor]] 13:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::Very well. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 16:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | ::::Very well. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 16:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Can Grolem 13 be connected to Lem's Golem XIV or something? --[[User:Stan423321|Stan423321]] 18:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 21 June 2011
At the bottom of the screen, why is Grolem 13 called: Bigum Aerum Tornadus Recyclus? It seems like a load of gibberish; it's not Latin, despite what it looks like. Anyone got any ideas on it? Evil Rayman 20:29, 26th September 2009
- I think it's added just for fun. - Zu
- The French version says "Fabrication En Flux Tendu". Spiraldoor 16:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Despite what it seems? It's actually pretty obvious for anyone endowed with something bearing resemblance to a functioning brain that it's not Latin :P It's just for fun. — Hunchman801 16:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I thought so, but it's very annoying. Evil Rayman 17:46, 28th September 2009
Hey, if there's a Grolem 13, doesn't that mean there are 12 more Grolems? Iheckler9 12:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Despite this interpretation being rather likely, pure speculation (i.e. not supported by a couple facts) is best avoided on the wiki ;) —Hunchman801 12:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- I think that by having a "13" it doesn't mean anything special. --Haruka 15:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
uh why is grolem 13 evil he's possibly neutral
- Nobody said he was evil. --
Haruka
14:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
i think his species is grolem
- And I think you are getting closer to make the sysops freaking out for real. --
Haruka
13:11, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- From now on we should revert his 'contributions' rather than clogging up the talk pages by responding to them. —Spiraldoor
13:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Very well. --
Haruka
16:27, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Very well. --
- From now on we should revert his 'contributions' rather than clogging up the talk pages by responding to them. —Spiraldoor
- And I think you are getting closer to make the sysops freaking out for real. --
Can Grolem 13 be connected to Lem's Golem XIV or something? --Stan423321 18:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)