Talk:Human: Difference between revisions
Sergiomonty (talk | contribs) |
Sergiomonty (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am unsure of something in the "Rayman Origins" section of this article. Livingstones certainly do not appear to be human. Any objections to me changing this?--[[User:Theduckofindeed|Theduckofindeed]] 01:56, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | I am unsure of something in the "Rayman Origins" section of this article. Livingstones certainly do not appear to be human. Any objections to me changing this?--[[User:Theduckofindeed|Theduckofindeed]] 01:56, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
:There is no evidence they are humans, and besides, humans haven't got green skin. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:37, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | :There is no evidence they are humans, and besides, humans haven't got green skin. --[[Image:Sparkle.gif]][[User:Haruka|Haruka]][[Image:Sparkle.gif]] 02:37, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | ||
::Hmm, I guess I'm being speculative about lividstones, I thought they were green because of the description that is given to them... I'm talking about the poor hygiene they have, but if you think it's not appropiate, I think you can take it out. In the other hand, Hunters are clearly humans; they were used in the forum as an evidence to the existance of humans in Rayman's universe--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] 05:17, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | ::Hmm, I guess I'm being speculative about lividstones, I thought they were green because of the description that is given to them... I'm talking about the poor hygiene they have, but if you think it's not appropiate, I think you can take it out. In the other hand, Hunters are clearly humans; they were used in the forum as an evidence to the existance of humans in Rayman's universe, and they don't appear to have any magical feature, just a regular, human appearance.--[[User:Sergiomonty|Sergiomonty]] 05:17, 20 August 2012 (CEST) | ||