Template talk:Rabbids series

Separation or Accumulation?

I believe this was debated before but now that we have been readjusting the templates and Spiral brought this up in an edit, I wonder if it is really worth to keep going to collect information about Rabbid games that are post-TV Party since it is where the franchises got officially separate into different ones and where Rayman nevermore made an appearance or vice-versa. The fact that they born originally for the "fourth" installment that got ultimately cancelled to transform into a party game spin-off made this create an issue: they are original Rayman characters so that would "force" us to keep following their games and other stuff. It also misses a lot of information for the most recent Rabbids games since the RPC members don't really buy their titles anymore (well, except one or two members lets say). What do you guys think about this? --Haruka 23:06, 17 April 2014 (CEST)

I think they should still be covered, since they're still rooted in the Rayman series. We need to at least acknowledge them, if only for the sake of completion. I say we only aim for BG&E/Tonic Trouble-level coverage of the ones that are completely disconnected from Rayman, though. —Spiraldoor 01:40, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

Fair enough. They are also both created by Michel Ancel, so it is a bonus. --Haruka 02:04, 18 April 2014 (CEST)

On another note, I see there's been some issues with the Rayman template in regards to linking it to the Rabbids, seeing as the Rabbids are technically a spin-off series of their own, perhaps we could remove the Rabbids section, and just have Rabbids (series) as one of the spin-off links?-- 21:13, 18 April 2014 (CEST)