So, like, three non-dorks then?Bradandez said:And the only people who defend it are a bunch of dorks.technology4617 said:The only people who say this suck terribly at the game. :tssk:Bradandez said:My Record Day Review of Rayman 1:
If Rayman 1 was an animal, it'd be a chick because it goes "Cheap, cheap, cheap!" 6.5/10
OR! It's gameplay should have been tested more and should have not used continues if it had a save feature already!RibShark said:Perhaps you just need to, you know, be GOOD at the game to enjoy it?
I see what you mean, in fact, I agree to some extent. Except for the "I'm not fond of the character design" bit. Ouch, man. I adore the character design. :lol:Bradandez said:It's not fluid as the recent games, which I love the controls of Origins/Legends. I'm not fond of the character design. The things I really like are the worlds and its music. I can't say I'm of the gameplay either. Oh and the ending... that ending... ugh...
I WILL BURN DOWN ALL OF PARIS BECAUSE OF YOU SAYING THAT!JeffreyHikariKurai said:Brad's just a dork yo.
Whoops, sorry. I'm not fond of those big, bulgy eyes. :winkgrin:THEdragon said:I see what you mean, in fact, I agree to some extent. Except for the "I'm not fond of the character design" bit. Ouch, man. I adore the character design. :lol:
Honestly, neither did I at first! In fact, I've never been a fan of huge, bulgy eyes on anything. When I first played Rayman Advance back in two thousand and something after playing Rayman 3 GBA for ages I was like "What the heck why are they so ugly looking" but now I just adore the Rayman 1 style. No clue why, really.Bradandez said:Whoops, sorry. I'm not fond of those big, bulgy eyes. :winkgrin:THEdragon said:I see what you mean, in fact, I agree to some extent. Except for the "I'm not fond of the character design" bit. Ouch, man. I adore the character design. :lol: